首页> 外文学位 >'Earth's great altar': Greek patristic theology and the sacrament of nature in Milton's 'Paradise Lost'
【24h】

'Earth's great altar': Greek patristic theology and the sacrament of nature in Milton's 'Paradise Lost'

机译:“地球的大祭坛”:弥尔顿的《失乐园》中的希腊教父神学和自然圣礼

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While much has been written about Milton's theology, Milton criticism lacks a sustained examination of his poetic theology vis-a-vis the Greek Fathers of the Eastern Church. But such an examination of Milton's poetics, especially in the prelapsarian books of Paradise Lost, sets in relief a rich sacramental vision of nature. This suggests (1) that nature, not just history, is a means by which God is immanent in creation, and (2) that nature is a means by which Adam and Eve may live in communion with God. Made imaqo dei, Adam and Eve are summoned to be the sovereigns of creation (to give form to nature) and the priests of creation (to offer this to God eucharistically). Through the fulfillment of this vocatio--exemplified in their eucharistic consumption of the food which God provides them--Adam and Eve possess the prospect of theosis. This involves not only their own deification but also the transfiguration of the entire created order so that it, too, may participate in God. This is a vision of nature that reiterates the theological vision of the Greek Fathers, especially those of the fourth century: Basil, Gregory of Nyssa, Gregory of Nazianzus, and Chrysostom. These Fathers constitute either Milton's sources or a locus of influence for his understanding of nature. Several things indicate this: (1) Milton purchased numerous editions of the Greek Fathers and read them extensively; (2) Milton sojourned for a month in Venice, home to the largest colony of Orthodox Christians in western Europe; (3) certain ideas of the Greek Fathers were widely disseminated during the seventeenth century. But there is one indication the Greek Fathers were not Milton's sources: Milton replaces nature with history as the sole arena of God's redemptive activity; so nature as a restored sacrament plays no part in the postlapsarian redemption of humankind. Adam's and Eve's postlapsarian redemption is incompatible with their prelapsarian possibilities. Milton fails to sustain nature as a sacrament, but the Greek Patristic character of his prelapsarian poetic theology can recover for us the universal character of the world conceived as a sacrament and humankind's eucharistic response in worship.
机译:虽然关于弥尔顿神学的著作很多,但弥尔顿的批评缺乏对他的诗歌神学与东方教会的希腊教父们的持续考察。但是,对弥尔顿诗学的这种审视,特别是在《失乐园》的荒诞书籍中,为自然树立了丰富的圣礼愿景。这表明 (1) 自然,而不仅仅是历史,是上帝在创造中内在的一种方式,以及 (2) 自然是亚当和夏娃可以与上帝共融的一种方式。亚当和夏娃被召唤成为创造的主权者(赋予自然形式)和创造的祭司(以圣体的方式将其献给上帝)。通过这个使命的实现--体现在他们对天主赐予他们的食物的圣餐消费中--亚当和夏娃拥有了神化的前景。这不仅涉及他们自己的神化,还涉及整个受造秩序的变形,以便它也可以参与上帝。这是一个自然观,重申了希腊教父的神学观,尤其是四世纪的神父们:巴西尔、尼撒的格里高利、拿先祖的格里高利和金口。这些神父要么构成了弥尔顿的来源,要么构成了他对自然的理解的影响点。有几件事表明了这一点:(1) 弥尔顿购买了希腊教父的许多版本,并广泛阅读了它们;(2) 弥尔顿在威尼斯逗留了一个月,威尼斯是西欧最大的东正教基督徒聚居地;(3) 希腊教父的某些思想在 17 世纪被广泛传播。但有一个迹象表明,希腊教父们并不是弥尔顿的来源:弥尔顿用历史取代了自然,成为上帝救赎活动的唯一舞台;因此,自然作为一种恢复的圣礼,在人类的后堕落救赎中没有发挥作用。亚当和夏娃的堕落后救赎与他们堕落前的可能性不相容。弥尔顿未能将自然作为一种圣礼来维持,但他的前堕落诗歌神学的希腊教父特征可以为我们恢复被设想为圣礼的世界的普遍特征,以及人类在敬拜中的圣体回应。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia;
  • 学科 British and Irish literature;Theology
  • 学位
  • 年度 1993
  • 页码 361
  • 总页数 361
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    British and Irish literature; Theology;

    机译:英国和爱尔兰文学;神学;
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号