首页> 外文学位 >Comparison of the effectiveness of participatory and didactic office ergonomics education programs.
【24h】

Comparison of the effectiveness of participatory and didactic office ergonomics education programs.

机译:参与式和教学式人体工程学教育计划效果的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders of computer users represent a growing, costly burden on employees, the workplace, the health care system, and society. Office ergonomic educational strategies, using a variety of approaches, have been developed and implemented to address this concern. The effectiveness of ergonomic educational approaches has not been well documented, nor have employees' perceptions of barriers or facilitators to making changes been explored.;Both the Didactic and the Participatory Education intervention groups demonstrated quantitative improvements relative to baseline on post-intervention measures of perception of ergonomic knowledge, self reported workstation evaluation and adjustment behaviours, and the ability to set up the workstation to allow for working in neutral positions. There was not, however, a significant difference between the two treatment groups.;The qualitative findings provided context to the workers' experience of employing ergonomic strategies in their work environment. Participants identified a wide range of barriers and facilitators to translating ergonomic knowledge into safe behaviours in the workplace. These barriers and facilitators were influenced by the method of information delivery. These findings provide valuable insight into the factors that affect knowledge uptake and behavioural changes in the work environment.;In summary, both methods of educational intervention were effective in creating positive workstation changes and safer workplace behaviours. The participants' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators which influence these changes may inform understanding of the complex process of translating knowledge into practice in the workplace.;This study evaluated and compared the effectiveness of two office ergonomics educational methods (didactic and participatory) when delivering office ergonomics education. A mixed method design was used, utilizing a sequential exploratory strategy. Forty seven employees from a health information contact centre work environment were assigned according to their work schedule to either a Participatory or a Didactic Ergonomics Education Group. Prior to participating in an educational intervention, participants completed a demographic profile, the Workstyle Questionnaire, a self report pain questionnaire, the Ergonomics Knowledge Self-measurement Scale and the Workstation Evaluation and Adjustment Questionnaire. In addition, the researcher visited each participants' workstation while the employee was working and completed a workstation analysis which addressed equipment placement and work practices. Subsequently each participant attended an office ergonomic education session for 60 minutes. Six weeks after delivery of the education session, participants were retested on quantitative measures, and the researcher returned to each participant's workstation to complete an additional workstation analysis. The researcher also met with each participant to ask a series of open ended questions regarding perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing workstation and work practice changes.
机译:计算机用户与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病给员工,工作场所,医疗保健系统和社会造成了越来越大的负担。已经开发并实施了使用各种方法的办公室人机工程学教育策略来解决这一问题。人体工程学教育方法的有效性尚未得到充分证明,员工的障碍或促进者进行改变的看法也未得到充分证明。教学法和参与式教育干预小组均表明,干预后的知觉测量值相对于基线有定量的改进人体工程学知识,自我报告的工作站评估和调整行为,以及能够设置工作站以在中立位置工作的能力。但是,两个治疗组之间没有显着差异。定性发现为工人在其工作环境中采用人机工程学策略提供了背景。参与者发现了将人体工程学知识转化为工作场所安全行为的各种障碍和促进者。这些障碍和促进者受到信息传递方法的影响。这些发现为了解影响知识吸收和工作环境中的行为变化的因素提供了宝贵的见识。总之,两种教育干预方法都可以有效地创造积极的工作场所变化和更安全的工作场所行为。参与者对影响这些变化的障碍和促进者的理解可能会有助于理解将知识转化为工作场所中的实践的复杂过程。本研究评估并比较了两种办公室人机工程学教育方法(指导和参与式)在交付时的有效性。办公室人体工学教育。使用了混合方法设计,利用了顺序探索策略。根据工作时间表,将来自健康信息联络中心工作环境的47名员工分配到参与式或教学人体工程学教育小组。在参加教育干预之前,参与者完成了人口统计资料,工作风格问卷,自我报告疼痛问卷,人体工程学知识自我测量量表以及工作站评估和调整问卷。此外,研究人员在员工工作时访问了每个参与者的工作站,并完成了针对设备放置和工作实践的工作站分析。随后,每个参与者参加了60分钟的办公室人体工学教育会议。教育会议进行六周后,对参与者进行了定量测量的重新测试,研究人员返回到每个参与者的工作站,以完成其他工作站分析。研究人员还会见了每位参与者,提出了一系列开放性的问题,这些问题涉及感知的障碍以及促进实施工作站和工作实践变更的障碍。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Manitoba (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Manitoba (Canada).;
  • 学科 Occupational safety.;Physical therapy.;Adult education.
  • 学位 M.Sc.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 169 p.
  • 总页数 169
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号