首页> 外文学位 >Intergenerational educational mobility and child-parent relationships: A response to absolute or structural mobility?
【24h】

Intergenerational educational mobility and child-parent relationships: A response to absolute or structural mobility?

机译:代际教育流动性和儿童与父母之间的关系:对绝对流动性或结构性流动的反应吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Research exploring the negative effects of intergenerational educational mobility is very common throughout the social science literature. The primary question driving this research is whether those who exceed the highest level of education attained by either of their parents have less cohesive ties with their parents than those who do not. Most of this research uses a metric of absolute mobility which directly compares the child's education to the education of their mother and father. However, if more people are receiving a college degree in the child's than in the parents' generation, it is possible that the child's mobility will be viewed less as an individual achievement and more as a structural phenomenon (Kalmijn 2006).;The research presented here contributes to the growing body of research on the effects of educational mobility a new metric of structural mobility (Sorensen 1977), which takes into account the changing trends in educational attainment. The overall purpose of this paper is to analyze how structural educational mobility differs from absolute mobility in its effects on child-parent relationships.;I find that absolute mobility does not impact child-parent relationships significantly. However, structural mobility was found to have a negative impact on child-parent relations when an individual is upwardly-mobile. When an individual is downwardly-mobile, structural mobility has a positive impact. Therefore, the effects of structural mobility indeed are more influential than absolute mobility, but not in the ways hypothesized by Kalmijn (2006).
机译:在整个社会科学文献中,探索代际教育流动性的负面影响的研究非常普遍。推动这项研究的主要问题是,那些父母中任何一方所接受的教育水平超过最高水平的人与父母之间的凝聚力联系是否比没有父母的人更紧密。大多数这项研究使用绝对流动性的度量标准,该度量标准直接将孩子的教育程度与其父母的教育程度进行比较。但是,如果在儿童方面获得大学学位的人比在父母一代中获得大学学位的人更多,则有可能儿童的流动性将不再被视为个人成就,而更多地被视为结构性现象(Kalmijn 2006)。在这里,关于教育流动性影响的研究不断发展,这是一种结构流动性的新指标(Sorensen 1977),其中考虑到了教育程度的变化趋势。本文的总体目的是分析结构性教育流动性与绝对流动性在对儿童父母关系的影响上有何不同。;我发现绝对流动性不会显着影响儿童与父母之间的关系。然而,当一个人向上运动时,发现结构性流动对儿童与父母的关系有负面影响。当一个人向下移动时,结构上的移动会产生积极的影响。因此,结构流动性的影响确实比绝对流动性更具影响力,但并非以Kalmijn(2006)所假设的方式发生。

著录项

  • 作者

    Willis, Eric.;

  • 作者单位

    Clemson University.;

  • 授予单位 Clemson University.;
  • 学科 Education Sociology of.;Sociology Individual and Family Studies.;Sociology Demography.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 66 p.
  • 总页数 66
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会学;社会学;人口统计学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号