首页> 外文学位 >An action research study: How can elementary teachers collaborate more effectively with parents to support student literacy learning?
【24h】

An action research study: How can elementary teachers collaborate more effectively with parents to support student literacy learning?

机译:一项行动研究:小学教师如何与父母更有效地合作以支持学生的识字学习?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Parental involvement (broadly defined as including both natural parents and other significant adults) has been consistently shown to produce positive results in students' literacy achievement, and there is widespread agreement among parents and school personnel about the value of parental involvement in education. However, educators do not routinely include parents in literacy learning programs. The literature suggests that there may be many reasons for this phenomenon, including educators' unfamiliarity with ways to build and sustain productive home-school connections.;I developed this study with the ultimate goal of initiating better home-school partnerships to support elementary students' literacy learning in my district, capitalizing on the findings of the rich literature on parental involvement. As a first step in this direction, I engaged a mixed group of elementary teachers and parents in my district in a Collegial Circle (a type of professional development offered in my district) designed to explore effective ways to collaborate with parents to support literacy learning. The Collegial Circle involved the participants in readings and discussions to make them aware of relevant literature findings, personal perceptions and biases, and alternative viewpoints, with the ultimate goal of producing a list of concrete recommendations about how to establish productive home-school collaborations to support literacy learning in our district.;Assuming action research as the research methodology, this intervention along with the accompanying data collection and analysis was designed to address the following research questions: (1) What are some of the perceived challenges to building effective partnerships between parents (broadly defined) and teachers in our district? (2) How can the challenges thus identified be overcome? (3) How has participation in the Collegial Circle changed the thinking of the participating parents and teachers concerning the concepts of parent-teacher partnerships and literacy?;I collected data from a variety of sources, including participants' reflective journals and other assignments, audiotapes and artifacts from the Collegial Circle sessions, and a researcher's journal. Qualitative methodology was employed to analyze these data with the goal of uncovering emerging themes that could shed light on each of the research questions.;Epstein's Theory of Overlapping Spheres and her typology of parental involvement provided the theoretical basis and framework informing the study. In the spirit of action research, teachers and parents participating in the Collegial Circle were not "passive participants" but rather were involved in on-going reflection about the Collegial Circle activities and provided input that changed some of the original plan and activities, as well as co-constructed with the researcher the list of recommendations constituting the end product of the Collegial Circle.
机译:父母参与(广泛定义为包括自然父母和其他重要成年人)一直被证明对学生的识字成绩产生积极的影响,并且父母和学校工作人员对父母参与教育的价值达成了广泛共识。但是,教育工作者通常不会将父母纳入识字学习计划。文献表明,造成这种现象的原因可能很多,包括教育者不熟悉建立和维持生产性家庭学校联系的方式。;我进行这项研究的最终目的是建立更好的家庭学校合作关系以支持小学生的学习。利用有关父母参与的丰富文献的发现,在我所在地区进行扫盲学习。作为朝着这个方向迈出的第一步,我在一个大学圈(由我所在地区提供的一种专业发展计划)中,让我所在地区的小学教师和家长混合在一起,目的是探索与父母合作以支持识字学习的有效方法。学院圈让参与者参与阅读和讨论,以使他们了解相关的文学发现,个人看法和偏见以及替代观点,最终目的是就如何建立有效的家庭与学校合作提供具体建议清单,以支持他们假设将行动研究作为研究方法,该干预措施以及随之而来的数据收集和分析旨在解决以下研究问题:(1)在父母之间建立有效的伙伴关系有哪些挑战? (广泛定义)和我们地区的老师? (2)如何克服所确定的挑战? (3)参加大学生社交圈如何改变了参与活动的父母和老师对父母与老师的伙伴关系和识字观念的看法?;我从各种来源收集了数据,包括参与者的反思性期刊和其他作业,录音带以及来自大学圈会议的文物,以及研究人员的日记。采用定性方法对这些数据进行分析,以发现可能揭示每个研究问题的新兴主题。爱泼斯坦的“重叠领域理论”和她父母参与的类型为研究提供了理论基础和框架。本着行动研究的精神,参加大学生圈活动的教师和家长不是“被动参与者”,而是参与了有关大学生圈活动的持续反思,并提供了一些改变原计划和活动的投入与研究人员共同构建的建议列表构成了大学圈的最终产品。

著录项

  • 作者

    St. George, Carol Yerger.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Rochester.;

  • 授予单位 University of Rochester.;
  • 学科 Education Elementary.;Sociology Individual and Family Studies.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 194 p.
  • 总页数 194
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号