首页> 外文学位 >Colour vision test for railway dispatchers.
【24h】

Colour vision test for railway dispatchers.

机译:铁路调度员的色觉测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Chapter 1. Introduction. Colour codes are used extensively in railways to convey specific information governing movement of trains and equipment on the track. One such task is the railway traffic control display that uses colour coded video display terminals (VDTs) to convey information of the signal status, train movements and track status to the railway dispatcher. Because individuals with colour vision deficiencies (colour-defectives) may have problems with these colour-related tasks, questions were raised about the suitability of colour vision defectives to work as railway dispatchers. In order to answer that, a VDT based Dispatch Colour Vision Test based on the actual railway traffic display was developed previously.;Chapter 2, 3 and 4. Methods. The Dispatch colour vision test was divided into three parts based on the colour sets that the dispatcher had to recognize. The testing computer system used the same RGB colour settings, graphics card and monitor as in railway dispatch centres. Subjects viewed the display colours and entered their responses by using a mouse. One hundred colour-normals and fifty two colour-defectives participated in the initial session. The test was repeated approximately after 10 days. Ninety three colour-normals (93%) and 44 (85%) colour-defectives participated in the second session. The total number of errors and time to complete the test was recorded.;Chapter 5-9. Results. Pass/Fail on the VDT Dispatch colour vision test was based on colour-normal errors. Ignoring orange-red errors, two errors were allowed in the first session and one error was allowed in the second session. Based on this criterion, 42% of colour vision defectives could perform as well as colour normal subjects. The kappa coefficient of agreement between the sessions for the colour-defectives was 0.85.;Detailed analysis between the colour differences and the errors showed only a weak correlation between the two. However, the general trend was that colour-defectives made more errors on colours that were near or along the same lines of confusions and the colours were nearly equal in luminance. Nevertheless, the interaction between luminance and location with respect to the lines of confusion was not easy to interpret.;Purpose. The main purpose of this thesis is to establish the pass/fail scores and repeatability of the VDT based Dispatch Colour Vision Test that resulted from the previous work. Secondly, the study will also examine whether clinical colour vision tests can predict the performance on the practical task.;The time to complete the task for the colour-defectives who passed the test took 14% longer than colour-normals and colour-defectives who failed took 30% longer than colour-normals. All groups showed a similar learning effect with an 18% reduction in mean times to complete the task at the second session. There was no significant correlation between the number of errors and time to complete or the clinical tests and completion times for any of the groups.;Clinical colour vision tests have limited value in predicting performance of colour-defectives on the Dispatch test. Logistic analysis results showed that the Farnsworth D-15 along with the Nagel was the best predictor of the VDT Dispatch colour test pass/fail results. However, these results were similar to using the Farnsworth D-15 test alone. Ninety-five percent of the individuals who failed the Farnsworth D-15 also failed the Dispatch test. However, approximately 25% of the individuals who passed the Farnsworth D-15 failed the VDT Dispatch colour test which is an unacceptable false negative rate. These results indicate the Farnsworth D-15 can only be used to predict who is likely to fail the dispatch test.;Chapter 10. Conclusions. Forty two percent of colour vision defectives could perform as well as colour-normals in identifying VDT railway display colours and time to complete the task. Clinical colour vision tests were inadequate predictors of performance in practical task, overall. However, the Farnsworth D-15 was a very good predictor of who would fail the VDT Dispatch test. Hence a practical VDT Dispatch test may be needed to test individuals who would want to work as railway dispatchers.
机译:第1章简介。在铁路中广泛使用颜色代码来传达特定信息,以控制火车和设备在轨道上的运动。一种这样的任务是铁路交通控制显示器,其使用彩色编码的视频显示终端(VDT)将信号状态,火车运动和轨道状态的信息传达给铁路调度员。由于有色觉缺陷的人(有缺陷的人)可能会在与这些与颜色有关的任务中遇到问题,因此提出了有关色觉缺陷在铁路调度员中的适用性的问题。为了回答这个问题,先前开发了基于VDT的基于实际铁路交通显示的调度色觉测试。第2、3和4章。根据调度员必须识别的颜色集,将Dispatch颜色视觉测试分为三个部分。测试计算机系统使用与铁路调度中心相同的RGB颜色设置,图形卡和监视器。受试者查看了显示的颜色,并使用鼠标输入了他们的反应。最初的会议中有一百个色彩正常的人和五十二个色彩缺陷的人。大约在10天后重复测试。第二十三场有93个颜色正常(93%)和44个(85%)颜色缺陷参加。记录错误的总数和完成测试的时间。;第5-9章。结果。 VDT Dispatch颜色视觉测试的通过/失败基于颜色正常错误。忽略橙红色错误,在第一个会话中允许两个错误,在第二个会话中允许一个错误。基于此标准,42%的色觉缺陷患者的表现与正常色者一样好。色缺陷的会话之间的一致性的卡伯系数为0.85。;对色差和误差之间的详细分析表明,两者之间的相关性很弱。但是,总的趋势是,瑕疵品会在接近或沿着相同混淆线的颜色上犯更多的错误,并且颜色的亮度几乎相等。然而,关于混乱线的亮度和位置之间的相互作用并不容易解释。本文的主要目的是建立基于VDT的Dispatch色觉测试的通过/失败分数和可重复性,该测试是先前工作的结果。其次,该研究还将检查临床色觉测试是否可以预测实际任务的性能。;通过测试的色缺陷者完成任务所需的时间比色正常者和色缺陷者完成测试所需的时间长14%失败的时间比正常颜色长30%。所有组都显示出类似的学习效果,平均减少18%的时间来完成第二节任务。任何一组的错误数量,完成时间或临床测试与完成时间之间均无显着相关性。临床色觉测试在预测Dispatch测试中色缺陷的表现方面价值有限。逻辑分析结果表明,Farnsworth D-15和Nagel是VDT Dispatch颜色测试通过/失败结果的最佳预测指标。但是,这些结果类似于仅使用Farnsworth D-15测试。不通过Farnsworth D-15的个人中有百分之九十五也没有通过Dispatch测试。但是,通过Farnsworth D-15的个人中约有25%的人通过了VDT Dispatch颜色测试,这是不可接受的假阴性率。这些结果表明,Farnsworth D-15仅可用于预测谁可能无法通过派遣测试。;第10章。结论。在识别VDT铁路显示器的颜色和时间以完成任务时,有42%的色觉缺陷可以和正常颜色一样好。总体而言,临床色觉测试不足以预测实际任务的表现。但是,Farnsworth D-15很好地预测了谁会通过VDT Dispatch测试。因此,可能需要进行实用的VDT派遣测试以测试想要作为铁路调度员工作的人员。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ramaswamy, Shankaran.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Waterloo (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Waterloo (Canada).;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Ophthalmology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 237 p.
  • 总页数 237
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号