首页> 外文学位 >Unique but inclusive individuality: A dialogue with John Dewey and Liang Shuming toward educational reform in China.
【24h】

Unique but inclusive individuality: A dialogue with John Dewey and Liang Shuming toward educational reform in China.

机译:独特但包容的个性:与杜威(John Dewey)和梁漱ming(Liang Shuming)对话,探讨中国的教育改革。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is written in the context of the radically changing Chinese society, in which the individual easily gets separated from the meaning of life and follows the dualistic social conventions for success. This problem is consistent with the situation of the present educational practice in schools. Education does not respond students' disconnection from the radically changing society and thus cannot provide a meaningful resource for cultivating individuals' self-identity. Thus, this dissertation suggests a philosophy of education which highlights the cultivation of students' unique but inclusive individuality so that the individual learns how to nurture one's own mind in this radically changing context rather than getting lost and feeling empty. This conception of individuality is inspired by the American pragmatist John Dewey and the Chinese Confucian scholar Liang Shuming, a contemporary of Dewey.;Though living in different cultural traditions, both of them suggest that we need to cultivate one's individuality if we are constructing a democratic and free society. Dewey's work criticizes the trend of extreme individualism in the context of American's rapid industrialization. Liang's work has a different focus because he meets the dilemma of China's modernization in which a rupture between the Confucian tradition and the westernization is very serious. Liang's concern is still alive in contemporary times because we do not have the strong tradition of individualism; however, we also need to deal with the trend of extreme individualism stimulated by the rapid marketization in the recent three decades. On one hand, we need to learn how to find lively connection with the tradition, thus gaining a resource to cultivate a modern culture; on the other hand, we need to deal with the tension of individualism and communal living. I suggest that these two issues are keys for developing a new conception of individuality in contemporary China. Both Dewey and Liang provide insightful thoughts on the issues.;I use a methodology of comparative philosophy of education to discuss my proposal on individuality in education. I am not trying to write Dewey and Liang's thought in a "right" way; neither am I trying to compare Dewey and Liang's thought for judgment. It is more about dialogue and communication, to learn from different but related thoughts for solving the problem in the present, in Dewey's terms. I am using a pragmatic approach to launch a philosophical discussion. Because my concern is shared by Dewey and Liang in their respective projects, this dialogue can be meaningful for my question.;After discussing Dewey's and Liang's thoughts, I propose a new idea of education: to cultivate a unique but inclusive individuality by going through inner struggles and gaining self-enlightenment. This experience of inner struggle is the ground in which to cultivate a true self and the basis for discovering an original and creative mind because the individual needs to face her need from her unique life experience and connect with the changing present. The moment that the individual goes through inner struggle is also the moment that the individual gains a sense of wholeness and thus includes the experiences of others into the self through which she expands the boundary of selfhood and self-transformation happens: the individual transforms the limits of the existent self and opens to new possibilities. It is the meaning of learning which the current Chinese education reform does not emphasize.;Finally, the dissertation proposes story-telling as a teaching approach to create new space for students and teachers in school. Story-telling is a method that the individual can interpret life experience in multiple ways to explore different alternatives and possibilities she may have and to find the consistent meaning to connect the past to the present. It is also a method of self-expression when the individual goes through inner struggle and finds connection with the world outside. It is an effort that the individual sees the consistency in life, or finds tradition meaningful in her present experience. In this effort, the individual is developing a mind of her own. Narrative is thus a method worth trying in the current educational practice to formulate a new philosophy of education which emphasizes the development of unique and inclusive individuality as one goal of education.
机译:本文是在一个瞬息万变的中国社会的背景下写成的,在这个社会中,个人很容易与生活的意义分离开来,并遵循了成功的二元社会惯例。这个问题与当前学校教育实践的情况是一致的。教育不能回应学生与激进社会的脱节,因此不能为培养个人的自我身份提供有意义的资源。因此,本论文提出了一种教育哲学,该哲学强调了学生独特但包容性个性的培养,使个人学会了如何在这种瞬息万变的环境中养育自己的思想,而不会迷失自己并感到茫然。这种个性观念的灵感来自美国实用主义者约翰·杜威(John Dewey)和杜威时代的当代中国儒家学者梁漱ming .;尽管生活在不同的文化传统中,但他们俩都暗示着我们在建设民主国家时需要培养个人的个性。和自由社会。杜威的工作批评了在美国快速工业化背景下极端个人主义的趋势。梁的工作重点不同,因为他遇到了中国现代化的两难困境,儒家传统与西方化之间的断裂非常严重。由于我们没有强大的个人主义传统,梁启超的关切在当代仍然存在。但是,我们还需要应对最近三十年来迅速的市场化所激发的极端个人主义趋势。一方面,我们需要学习如何找到与传统的生动联系,从而获得培养现代文化的资源。另一方面,我们需要应对个人主义和社区生活的紧张关系。我认为这两个问题是在当代中国发展新的个性观念的关键。杜威和梁启超都对这些问题提出了深刻的见解。我使用比较教育哲学的方法论来讨论我关于教育个性的建议。我并不是要以“正确”的方式来写杜威和梁的思想;我也不是想将杜威和梁启超的思想作比较。用杜威的话来说,更多的是对话和沟通,以学习解决当前问题的不同但相关的思想。我使用一种务实的方法来进行哲学讨论。由于杜威和梁启超在各自的项目中都表达了我的关注,这种对话对我的问题可能是有意义的。在讨论了杜威和梁启超的思想之后,我提出了一种新的教育理念:通过内在的培养独特而包容的个性奋斗并获得自我启发。这种内心挣扎的经历是培养真实自我的基础,也是发掘独创性和创造性思维的基础,因为个人需要通过自己独特的生活经历来面对自己的需求,并与瞬息万变的当下联系起来。个体进行内心挣扎的时刻,也是个体获得整体感,从而将他人的经验纳入自我的那一刻,通过她她扩展了自我的界限,并发生了自我转变:个体改变了极限存在的自我,开启了新的可能性。当前的汉语教学改革并未强调学习的意义。最后,论文提出了讲故事的教学方法,为学生和教师创造了新的学习空间。讲故事是一种方法,个人可以用多种方式解释生活经验,以探索她可能拥有的不同选择和可能性,并找到将过去与现在联系起来的一致含义。当个体经历内心的挣扎并找到与外界的联系时,它也是一种自我表达的方法。个人要努力地看到生活的一致性,或者从她目前的经历中发现传统是有意义的。通过这种努力,个人正在发展自己的思想。因此,叙事是在当前的教育实践中值得尝试的一种方法,用以拟订一种新的教育理念,强调发展独特和包容的个性作为教育的目标。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zhang, Huajun.;

  • 作者单位

    The Florida State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Florida State University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Education Administration.;Education Philosophy of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 188 p.
  • 总页数 188
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:21

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号