首页> 外文学位 >Ethnic limits: Negotiating ethnicity, race, and community boundaries in suburban Chicago.
【24h】

Ethnic limits: Negotiating ethnicity, race, and community boundaries in suburban Chicago.

机译:种族限制:在芝加哥郊区就种族,种族和社区界限进行谈判。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Through the lens of three Chicago suburbs, this dissertation charts the history of ethnic community formation and ethnicity in the twentieth century. Examining German Jews in Highland Park, Irish Catholics in Beverly, and Czechs in Cicero, it traces transformations in ethnicity through changes in the definitions of community boundaries from the 1920s through the 1960s. Careful examination of ethnic populations in Chicago's suburbs reveals not the disappearance of ethnicity as other historians have postulated, but its persistence across this period. Expressions of ethnicity and the relationship of the ethnic group to the mainstream population shifted over time, but those communities were still very much guided by ethnic associations even as late as the 1960s. Moreover, although ethnic groups did increasingly express racial identities in postwar America, that adaptation was a pragmatic choice to maintain community; rather than representing an abandonment of ethnic community, whiteness worked in tandem with ethnicity to preserve those suburban communities.;This dissertation asserts that the history of ethnicity in the twentieth century can be understood through definitions of community boundaries and their change over time---from rigid and exclusive in the 1920s, bringing ethnic populations into conflict with other groups, to non-geographic definitions of community in the 1930s, to expansive boundaries in the 1950s. Finally, in the 1960s, porous and non-exclusive boundaries made it possible for ethnic groups to unite under racial or religious labels in order to preserve traditional definitions of community. Just as community boundaries looked different in 1960 than they had in 1920, so too did ethnicity---it became less exclusive, making it possible for ethnic suburbanites of different groups to come together under racial banners for the good of the neighborhood. Yet, even within these larger groups, ethnic participants maintained a sense of difference; coalescence and cooperation did not indicate the erasure of ethnic difference.
机译:本文通过三个芝加哥郊区的镜头,描绘了20世纪种族社区形成和种族的历史。考察了高地公园的德国犹太人,比佛利的爱尔兰天主教徒和西塞罗的捷克人,它通过改变1920年代到1960年代的社区边界的定义来追溯种族的转变。仔细检查芝加哥郊区的族裔人口,并没有发现其他历史学家所假定的种族的消失,而是在整个时期的持续性。种族的表达方式和种族与主流人口的关系随着时间的推移而发生变化,但直到1960年代,这些社区仍在很大程度上受到种族协会的指导。而且,尽管在战后的美国,各族裔确实越来越多地表达种族身份,但这种适应是维持社区的务实选择。白色不是代表放弃民族社区,而是与种族共同作用来保护郊区社区。本论文断言,可以通过定义社区边界及其随时间的变化来理解二十世纪的种族历史。从1920年代的僵化和排他性种族歧视到其他人群,到1930年代的非地理社区定义,再到1950年代的广阔边界。最终,在1960年代,多孔的和非排他性的边界使种族群体得以在种族或宗教标签下团结起来,以保留传统的社区定义。就像1960年的社区边界和1920年的社区边界看起来不同一样,种族也变得更加不那么排外,这使得不同群体的郊区居民聚在一起受到种族旗帜的影响,从而造福了邻里。但是,即使在这些较大的群体中,种族参与者也保持了差异感。合并与合作并未表明种族差异的消除。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lee, Margaret Brennan.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 History United States.;Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.;Geography.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 373 p.
  • 总页数 373
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号