首页> 外文学位 >A comparative evaluation: Community-based, mental health crisis intervention treatment models and outcomes.
【24h】

A comparative evaluation: Community-based, mental health crisis intervention treatment models and outcomes.

机译:比较评估:基于社区的心理健康危机干预治疗模型和结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Mobile mental health crisis response services personnel provide community-based crisis intervention (CBCI) with the primary goals of stabilizing individuals in crisis within their own communities and avoiding emergency psychiatric hospitalization. While previous research has demonstrated the general efficacy of CBCI in meeting its goals, an important gap remains regarding whether particular models of intervention result in differential outcomes. In this quantitative archival study, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was compared with person centered solutions based therapy (PCSBT) to examine differential outcomes on diversion from restrictive setting placement. Diversion also was compared across four presenting problems: mood, psychosis, personality, and other disturbance. Data on 1,440 cases were compiled from five community mental health centers across the United States. Results of chi-square tests of independence indicated that CBT resulted in greater than expected diversion rates compared to PCSBT. Findings also indicated that those presenting with mood disturbances were more likely to experience restrictive setting placement than those presenting with other problems. Results are discussed with respect to the non-experimental design limitations, but also with respect to potential best practice models for CBCI. A best practice model targeting the most efficacious treatment type for particular types of presenting problems could greatly enhance the goals of stabilizing individuals in crisis and avoiding emergency psychiatric hospitalization, thus contributing to social change in mental health care.
机译:流动心理健康危机应对服务人员为社区危机干预(CBCI)提供主要目标,以使处于危机中的个人稳定在自己社区内,并避免紧急的精神病住院。尽管先前的研究已经证明了CBCI在实现其目标方面的一般功效,但是在特定的干预模型是否导致不同的结果方面仍然存在重要的差距。在这项定量档案研究中,将认知行为疗法(CBT)与以人为中心的基于解决方案的疗法(PCSBT)进行了比较,以检验从限制性环境安置转移的不同结局。还对存在的四个问题进行了转移:情绪,精神病,人格和其他障碍的比较。从美国五个社区精神卫生中心收集了1,440例病例的数据。卡方独立性检验的结果表明,与PCSBT相比,CBT的转移率要高出预期。研究结果还表明,与那些有其他问题的人相比,那些有情绪障碍的人更容易受到限制性环境的影响。讨论的结果涉及非实验设计的局限性,还涉及CBCI的潜在最佳实践模型。针对特定类型出现问题的针对最有效治疗类型的最佳实践模型可以极大地提高稳定处于危机中的个人并避免紧急精神病院住院治疗的目标,从而促进精神卫生保健领域的社会变革。

著录项

  • 作者

    Keller, Michael.;

  • 作者单位

    Walden University.;

  • 授予单位 Walden University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Clinical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 94 p.
  • 总页数 94
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医学心理学、病理心理学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:19

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号