首页> 外文学位 >Does the Chopawamsic Fault Represent the Main Iapetan Suture in the Southern Appalachian Orogen? Geology, Geochemistry, and Geochronology of the Western Piedmont of Virginia and Insight into Local Intraplate Seismicity.
【24h】

Does the Chopawamsic Fault Represent the Main Iapetan Suture in the Southern Appalachian Orogen? Geology, Geochemistry, and Geochronology of the Western Piedmont of Virginia and Insight into Local Intraplate Seismicity.

机译:乔帕瓦西断层是否代表了南部阿巴拉契亚造山带的伊本缝合带?弗吉尼亚州西部皮埃蒙特的地质,地球化学和年代学以及对局部板内地震活动的认识。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The western Piedmont of north-central Virginia includes two main lithotectonic units: the early Paleozoic Potomac terrane and the Ordovician Chopawamsic terrane. The Potomac terrane is mostly an assemblage of multiply deformed phyllite, metasandstone, and metagraywacke. Previous workers have interpreted the sediments that now make up the Potomac terrane to have been deposited offshore of, and derived from, the Laurentian craton. The Chopawamsic terrane consists mostly of bimodal volcanic and associated epiclastic rocks. Previous work has shown that the Chopawamsic arc was built above currently unexposed Mesoproterozoic crust; however, the cratonic affinity of this crust has not been identified. The suture between the Potomac and Chopawamsic terranes is the Chopawamsic fault. If the Chopawamsic terrane is peri-Gondwanan (exotic to Laurentia), then the Chopawamsic fault would mark the closure of the early Paleozoic Iapetus Ocean in the southern Appalachian orogen---where it has not been previously identified. Chapters 1, 2, and 4 address this main hypothesis of the possible Iapetan suture and chapter 3 addresses the connection of deformed Paleozoic rocks and modern intraplate seismicity in the Central Virginia Seismic Zone.;Chapter 1 focuses specifically on the relationship between the Chopawamsic fault and the latest Ordovician -- earliest Silurian Ellisville granodiorite pluton. The pluton had previously been shown to intrude the fau however, no detailed mapping had been done to prove this relationship. My new mapping, in conjunction with previous mapping to the north, as well as new geochemical and geochronological sampling throughout the geographic areas and textural phases of the pluton, confirms the stitching nature of the Ellisville pluton. The age of the early and most volumetrically significant phase of the pluton, reported here, is 444 +/- 4 Ma. Because no sign of reactivation along the fault has been previously reported or discovered in this study, we interpret the age of the Ellisville pluton to represent a date of latest possible motion on the Chopawamsic fault. Limited kinematic information for the Chopawamsic fault is also presented here.;In chapter 2, the results of 1,289 detrital zircon U-Pb, LA-ICPMS analyses are reported. Samples in the composite Potomac terrane include mostly Mesoproterozoic zircons that are consistent with a Laurentian source. Samples from the Chopawamsic terrane include---almost exclusively---Ordovician zircons likely derived from co-eval volcanic rocks in the Chopawamsic terrane. Limited older zircons in these Chopawamsic metasedimentary rocks may hint at a possible peri-Gondwanan source, but are not numerous enough to be conclusive. The Arvonia successor basin, which overlies the Chopawamsic terrane, includes populations of both Mesoproterozoic and Ordovician-Silurian detrital zircons. These dates, with supporting field relationships, indicate that the Arvonia basin was deposited in the Late Ordovician -- Early Silurian only after the accretion of the Chopawamsic arc to the Potomac terrane.;Chapter 3 was not a planned part of the original study but came about after a M5.8 earthquake, centered in central Virginia, shook the majority of the eastern U.S. Aftershock analysis and field observations in the epicentral area are presented here and support a connection between the attitude of previously deformed rocks and the orientation of modern seismogenic surfaces.;Chapter 4 is a field trip guidebook prepared for the 2014, Blacksburg, VA southeast section meeting of the Geological Society of America. This guide highlights some of the most important and accessible outcrops that have been sampled in this study for geochemical and/or geochronological analyses. Many of the field trip stops correspond to rocks described in the first 3 chapters, and others highlight geochemical and geochronological analyses yet to be formally prepared for publication in a non-field guide format.
机译:弗吉尼亚州中北部的西部皮埃蒙特包括两个主要的岩石构造单元:早期的古生代波托马克地层和奥陶纪的乔瓦瓦西地层。波托马克地层主要是多重变形的千枚岩,变质砂岩和变灰质瓦克的组合。以前的工作人员已经解释了现在构成波托马克地层的沉积物,这些沉积物是从劳伦山脉克拉通的近海沉积而来的。 Chopawamsic地层主要由双峰火山岩和伴生的碎屑岩组成。以前的工作表明,在当前未暴露的中元古代地壳之上建立了Chopawamsic弧。但是,尚未发现该地壳的克拉通亲和力。波托马克和Chopawamsic地层之间的缝合线是Chopawamsic断层。如果Chopawamsic地层是Gondwanan周围(Laurentia特有的),则Chopawamsic断层将标志着阿巴拉契亚南部造山带早古生代Iapetus海洋的关闭-此前尚未发现。第1章,第2章和第4章讨论了可能的Iapetan缝合线的主要假设,第3章讨论了弗吉尼亚中部地震带中变形的古生代岩石与现代板内地震活动之间的联系;第1章专门讨论了Chopawamsic断层与断层之间的关系。最新的奥陶纪-志留纪埃利斯维尔最早的花岗闪长岩体。先前已证明该子体会侵入该断层。但是,没有进行详细的映射来证明这种关系。我的新测绘,再加上以前对北方的测绘,以及整个岩体的地理区域和构造阶段的新地球化学和年代学采样,证实了埃利斯维尔岩体的缝合性质。此处报告的轻子的早期和体积上最重要的阶段的年龄为444 +/- 4 Ma。由于以前没有在该研究中报告或发现沿断层再活化的迹象,因此我们将埃利斯维尔岩体的年龄解释为代表Chopawamsic断层最新运动的日期。第二章报告了1,289碎屑锆石U-Pb,LA-ICPMS分析的结果。复合波托马克地层中的样品主要包括中古生界锆石,与劳伦岩源一致。乔帕瓦西地块的样本包括-几乎全部是-奥陶纪锆石,可能来自乔帕瓦西地块的同时代火山岩。这些Chopawamsic沉积沉积岩中有限的较老锆石可能暗示了冈瓦纳河周的可能来源,但数量不足以得出结论。覆盖Chopawamsic地层的Arvonia后续盆地包括中元古生代和奥陶纪-西陆纪碎屑锆石。这些日期以及支持的田间关系表明,只有在Chopawamsic弧向波托马克地体上增生之后,Arvonia盆地才沉积在奥陶纪晚期-志留纪早期;第三章不是原始研究的计划部分,但出现了大约在以弗吉尼亚州中部为中心的M5.8地震发生后,震撼了美国东部大部分地区。此处介绍了震后分析和震中地区的实地观察,并支持了先前变形的岩石的姿态与现代地震发生面的方向之间的联系。 。;第4章是为美国地质学会2014年弗吉尼亚州布莱克斯堡东南部分会议准备的实地考察指南。本指南重点介绍了本研究中为地球化学和/或年代学分析而采样的一些最重要且最容易接近的露头。许多野外旅行站点对应于前三章中描述的岩石,其他野外站点突出了尚未正式准备以非野外指南形式出版的地球化学和年代学分析。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hughes, Kenneth Stephen.;

  • 作者单位

    North Carolina State University.;

  • 授予单位 North Carolina State University.;
  • 学科 Geology.;Geochemistry.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 339 p.
  • 总页数 339
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号