首页> 外文学位 >Assessing the contribution of legacy sediment and mill dam storage to sediment budgets in the Piedmont of Maryland.
【24h】

Assessing the contribution of legacy sediment and mill dam storage to sediment budgets in the Piedmont of Maryland.

机译:评估遗留沉积物和磨房水坝存储对马里兰州皮埃蒙特沉积物预算的贡献。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The disparity between watershed erosion rates and downstream sediment delivery has been an important theme in geomorphology for many decades, and the role of floodplains in sediment storage has frequently been cited. In the Piedmont province of the eastern US, upland deforestation and agricultural land use following European settlement led to deposition of thick packages of overbank sediment in valley bottoms, commonly referred to as "legacy" deposits. Previous authors have cited geomorphic evidence that some of this legacy sediment has been remobilized by lateral migration of channels. Recent interest has focused on the role of historic mill dams as a cause of floodplain aggradation, and on mill-dam deposits as a potentially important source of sediment exported downstream. This thesis seeks to address several outstanding questions: 1) How rapidly is sediment being remobilized from Baltimore County floodplains by channel migration and bank erosion? 2) What proportion of this sediment is derived from legacy deposits? 3) Is the presence of mill dams a necessary prerequisite for aggradation of legacy sediment? 4) How important are mill-dam deposits by comparison with other sediment sources contributing to downstream sediment yields?;In order to answer these questions, we measured gross and net bank erosion rates along 25 valley reaches from 18 watersheds with drainage areas between 1.8 and 155 km2 in northern Baltimore County, Maryland, including sites with and without mill dams. We compared stream morphology from LiDAR-based digital elevation data collected in 2005 with channel positions recorded on 1:2400 scale topographic maps from 1959-1961 in order to quantify nearly 50 years of channel change. Sediment samples were collected from stream banks and bars in order to characterize bulk density and particle-size distribution for use in converting volume to mass for comparison with other sediment sources.;Average annual lateral migration rates ranged from 0.06 - 0.19 m/year, which represented an annual migration of 3% (0.9-5.5%) channel width across all sites, suggesting that channel dimensions may be used as reasonable predictors of bank erosion rates. Gross bank erosion rates varied from 50 to 310 Mg/km/yr (median = 114) and were positively correlated with drainage area. Measured in-channel deposition accounted for an average of 47% (28-75%) of gross erosion, with deposition increasing in importance at larger drainage areas. Legacy sediments accounted for 6-90% of bank erosion at individual sites, represented about 60% of bank height at most exposures, and accounted for 67% of the measured gross erosion. Extrapolating the results indicated that first- and second-order streams account for 59% of total stream bank erosion from 1026 km2 of northern Baltimore County. After accounting for estimated redeposition, net stream bank sediment yields (74 Mg/km2/yr) constitute 71% of the estimated average Piedmont watershed yield (104 Mg/km2/yr).;Field evidence confirmed that legacy sediments existed at sites with and without mill dams. At the reach scale, mill-dam deposits contributed an average of 14.8% more sediment per unit length than typical stream channels, but the cumulative importance of mill-dam deposits as sediment sources decreased with increasing spatial scale. Cross-scale comparisons suggest that potential sediment contributions from mill-dam deposits may peak along low- to mid-basin reaches (10-40 km2). The results suggest mill dams should not be universally regarded as dominant sources of sediment from Piedmont tributaries to the Chesapeake Bay.
机译:流域侵蚀率与下游沉积物输送之间的差异已成为地貌学的一个重要主题,几十年来,洪泛区在沉积物存储中的作用经常被提及。在美国东部的皮埃蒙特省,欧洲定居后的高地森林砍伐和农业用地导致在谷底沉积了厚厚的一揽子河床沉积物,通常被称为“传统”矿床。先前的作者引用了地貌证据,表明这些遗留沉积物中的一些已通过河道的侧向迁移而迁移。最近的关注点集中在历史悠久的磨坊大坝作为洪泛平原积聚的原因上,以及磨坊大坝的沉积物作为向下游出口的潜在重要沉积物来源。本文试图解决几个悬而未决的问题:1)巴尔的摩县河漫滩由于渠道迁移和河岸侵蚀而迅速迁移了沉积物? 2)这些沉积物的多少来自传统沉积物? 3)碾磨机大坝的存在是否是旧沉积物积聚的必要前提? 4)与其他沉积物来源相比,碾磨水坝沉积物对下游沉积物产量的贡献有多重要?;为了回答这些问题,我们测量了18个流域,排水面积在1.8至1.5之间的25个河谷流域的总和净侵蚀率。马里兰州巴尔的摩县北部的155平方公里,包括有无水坝的场所。我们将2005年基于LiDAR的数字高程数据中的流形态与1959-1961年以1:2400比例尺地形图记录的通道位置进行了比较,以量化近50年的通道变化。从河床和河堤收集沉积物样本,以表征堆积密度和粒度分布,以将体积转换为质量,以与其他沉积物来源进行比较;年平均横向迁移率范围为0.06-0.19 m /年代表所有站点的通道宽度每年迁移3%(0.9-5.5%),这表明通道尺寸可用作银行侵蚀率的合理预测指标。总河岸侵蚀率从50到310 Mg / km / yr不等(中位数= 114),并且与流域面积成正相关。测得的河道内沉积物平均占总侵蚀的47%(28-75%),在较大的流域,沉积物的重要性日益增加。传统沉积物占单个地点河岸侵蚀的6-90%,在大多数暴露情况下约占河岸高度的60%,占测得总侵蚀的67%。外推结果表明,从巴尔的摩北部1026平方公里起,一阶和二阶流占总流库侵蚀的59%。在考虑了估计的再沉积后,净河岸沉积物产量(74 Mg / km2 / yr)构成了皮埃蒙特流域平均估计产量(104 Mg / km2 / yr)的71%。没有磨水坝。在河段水位,碾磨水坝沉积物每单位长度的沉积物平均比典型的河道多出14.8%,但是随着沉积物来源的增加,碾磨水坝沉积物的累积重要性随着空间规模的增加而减少。跨比例的比较表明,磨坊坝沉积物的潜在沉积物贡献可能在中低盆地(10-40 km2)达到峰值。结果表明,不应将磨房水坝普遍视为从皮埃蒙特支流到切萨皮克湾的主要沉积物来源。

著录项

  • 作者

    Donovan, Mitchell Ryan.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Maryland, Baltimore County.;

  • 授予单位 University of Maryland, Baltimore County.;
  • 学科 Geomorphology.;Hydrology.;Geodesy.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 160 p.
  • 总页数 160
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号