首页> 外文学位 >Field Training Officers' Ratings of Communication and Listening Skills in Police Officer Trainees.
【24h】

Field Training Officers' Ratings of Communication and Listening Skills in Police Officer Trainees.

机译:实地培训官员对警察实习生的沟通和听力技能的评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Researchers regard modern day policing as a dynamic profession due to factors such as growing community needs, technological advances, and expansion of law-enforcement duties (Glenn et al., 2003). These factors require that police officers develop effective ways to think critically about the costs and benefits of their actions in the field, particularly when engaging in intense and stressful situations that often require rapid decisions and decisive actions. To promote such effective performance under pressure, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) has made a concerted effort to examine how to best prepare their police officers for policing within the 21st century, a process that has focused on an examination of police training methods and procedures. This process has resulted in curriculum changes to the LAPD Academy Recruit Basic Course (RBC) to better prepare incoming police officers for the challenges of modern day police work. The purpose of this study is to examine themes that have emerged from interviews with Field Training Officers (FTOs) in which they evaluated the field performance of Probationary Officers (P1s) trained in either the Old or New Curriculum. This comparison will specifically examine the qualitative data gathered from FTOs' survey responses and explore the nuanced information provided within their evaluations of P1 communication and listening skills.
机译:由于社区需求的增长,技术进步和执法职责的扩大等因素,研究人员将现代警务视为一个充满活力的职业(Glenn等,2003)。这些因素要求警察制定有效的方法,以批判性地思考他们在实地行动的成本和收益,尤其是在处于紧张和压力大的局势中时,往往需要快速的决定和果断的行动。为了在压力下促进这种有效的表现,洛杉矶警察局(LAPD)共同努力,研究如何最有效地准备其警务人员在21世纪的警务工作,该过程的重点是检查警察的训练方法和程序。此过程导致了LAPD学院新兵基础课程(RBC)的课程更改,以更好地为即将到来的警官做好应对现代警察工作挑战的准备。这项研究的目的是研究与现场培训官(FTO)访谈中出现的主题,他们在访谈中评估了在旧课程或新课程中受训的试用官(P1)的现场表现。这种比较将专门检查从FTO的调查反馈中收集的定性数据,并探索他们在评估P1交流和听力技能时提供的细微差别的信息。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wong, Jonathan Sze Yin.;

  • 作者单位

    Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Psychology.;

  • 授予单位 Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Psychology.;
  • 学科 Psychology Clinical.;Speech Communication.;Education Educational Psychology.;Sociology Criminology and Penology.;Education Adult and Continuing.
  • 学位 Psy.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 56 p.
  • 总页数 56
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号