首页> 外文学位 >The 'knockings and batterings' within: Late modernism's reanimations of narrative form.
【24h】

The 'knockings and batterings' within: Late modernism's reanimations of narrative form.

机译:内在的“敲打与打击”:晚期现代主义对叙事形式的复活。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation corrects the notion that fiction written in the late 1920s through the early 1940s fails to achieve the mastery and innovation of high modernism. It posits late modernism as a literary dispensation that instead pushes beyond high modernism's narrative innovations in order to fully express individuals' lived experience in the era between world wars. This dissertation claims novels by Elizabeth Bowen, Evelyn Waugh, and Samuel Beckett, as exemplars of a late modernism characterized by invocation and redeployment of conventionalized narrative forms in service of fresh explorations of the dislocation, inauthenticity, and alienation that characterize this era. By deforming and repurposing formal conventions, these writers construct entirely new forms whose disfigured likenesses to the genres they manipulate reveals a critical orientation to the canon.;These writers' reconfigurations of forms--including the bildungsroman, the epistolary novel, and autobiography--furthermore reveal the extent to which such conventionalized genres coerce and prescribe a unified and autonomous subjectivity. By dismantling these genres from within, Bowen, Waugh, and Beckett reveal their mechanics to be instrumental in coercing into being a notion of the subject that is both limiting and delimited. These authors also invoke popular forms--including the Gothic aesthetic, imperial adventure narrative, and detective fiction--to reveal that non-canonical texts, too, participate in the process by which narrative inevitably posits consciousness as its premise.;I draw upon Tyrus Miller's conception of late modernism to explicate how these authors' various engagements with established forms simultaneously perform immanent critique and narrative innovation. This dissertation also endorses David Lloyd's assertion that canonical narrative forms are instrumental in producing subjectivity within text and thereby act as a coercive exemplar for readers. I invoke several critics' engagements with conventional genres' narrative mechanics to explicate this process. By examining closely the admixture of narrative forms that churns beneath the surfaces of these texts, I aim to pinpoint how the deformation of conventionalized forms can yield a fresh and distinctly late modernist vision of selfhood.
机译:这篇论文纠正了以下观念:1920年代后期到1940年代初期写的小说未能达到对高现代主义的掌握和创新。它将晚期的现代主义假定为一种文学创作,它超越了高级现代主义的叙事创新,以充分表达个人在两次世界大战之间时代的生活经验。本文以伊丽莎白·鲍文(Elizabeth Bowen),伊芙琳·沃(Evelyn Waugh)和塞缪尔·贝克特(Samuel Beckett)的小说为代表,它们是晚期现代主义的典范,其特征在于对传统叙事形式的调用和重新部署,以服务于对这一时代特征的错位,虚伪和异化的新探索。这些作家通过变形和重新使用正式的惯例,构建了全新的形式,这些形式与他们所操纵的类型相像,显示出对经典的严格认识。进一步揭示了这种常规体裁的程度,并规定了统一和自主的主观性。通过从内部拆解这些流派,Bowen,Waugh和Beckett揭示了他们的机制有助于强迫成为受限制和受限制的主题的概念。这些作者还引用了流行的形式-包括哥特式美学,帝国冒险叙事和侦探小说-以揭示非规范文本也参与了叙事不可避免地以意识为前提的过程。泰勒斯·米勒(Tyrus Miller)的晚期现代主义概念阐明了这些作者以既定形式进行的各种活动如何同时进行内在的批判和叙事创新。本文还赞同戴维·劳埃德(David Lloyd)的主张,即规范的叙事形式有助于在文本内产生主观性,从而成为读者的强制性榜样。我援引一些批评家对传统体裁的叙事机制的阐述来阐明这一过程。通过仔细检查在这些文本的表面之下搅动的叙述形式的混合,我的目的是查明传统形式的变形如何产生新的,明显是近代的现代主义自我观。

著录项

  • 作者

    Noyce, Jennifer E.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Oregon.;

  • 授予单位 University of Oregon.;
  • 学科 English literature.;Modern literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 216 p.
  • 总页数 216
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号