首页> 外文学位 >'A distant grief:' Narrative bioethics and the lived experience of alienation in advanced stage cancer patients.
【24h】

'A distant grief:' Narrative bioethics and the lived experience of alienation in advanced stage cancer patients.

机译:“遥远的悲伤:”叙事生物伦理学和晚期癌症患者异化的生活经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Narrative bioethics is quite central to the work of bioethics. However, the nature of narrative bioethics is often misunderstood, and its methods of inquiry are sometimes marginalized as medical humanities or anti-theorist critique. This project explores how current misunderstandings about narrative bioethics contribute to blind spots in the advocacy for and care of seriously ill patients, particularly those with advanced stage cancer. Many of these patients suffer considerable distress resulting in the experience of deep alienation. Drawing from insights of a phenomenological-hermeneutical study of the lived experience of alienation, this project offers the initial development of a two-tiered narrative-hermeneutical bioethics. More importantly, this particular narrative investigation suggests important changes for bioethics, medical training, and the care of cancer patients.;In the care of alienated patients, two harms are present: the first harm caused by the illness and its treatments and the second harm caused by dismissal, compartmentalization, or denial of patient distress. In other words, the lived experience of alienation goes unacknowledged in advanced stage cancer patients. To the extent that medical care ignores this disruption, it denies the humanity of the patient. To the extent that medical care increases this sense of disruption, it violates the most basic moral requirement in the practice of medicine: do no harm. Because patient alienation is made worse by medical caregivers, a second harm is done. Chapter one considers the suffering of end-stage cancer patients, and why patient alienation is overlooked in medical care.;A second blind spot happens in bioethical reflection, due to how bioethical work is misconceived. A naturalist perspectival view of bioethics limits how narrative bioethics is practiced by determining legitimate knowledge as that defined by the sciences and formal rationality. A result of this perspective is that interpretive inquiry, which is necessary to knowledge of human experience and value, is side-lined. Not only does interpretive inquiry define narrative bioethics, but it is also central to addressing the deep suffering of such patients. Chapter two reconsiders how narrative bioethics and methods should be defined.;Chapter three considers narrative knowledge, phenomenological description, and hermeneutical interpretation in understanding lived experience. Experience, value, and meaning are central to narrative knowledge. Phenomenological and hermeneutical methods offer additional tools to those used in various forms of narrative analysis. Contemplative reflection through reading and writing leads to an understanding of the relational reality of the one who suffers.;Chapter four explores the experience of alienation, which begins in Zerrissenheit, estranges the patient, evokes a quality of surreality, dislocates the patient, disrupts the experience of time and body, and isolates one from self, others, and the divine. It is a 'distant grief' bar none.;Such reflection suggests outlines for a hermeneutical narrative ethics. Drawing from Emmanuel Levinas, Martin Buber, and Gabriel Marcel, chapter five emphasizes elements not developed in usual models of ethical work: the encounter and moral appeal (presence), hermeneutical reflection (empathy), and moral tasks (hope). In essence, narrative bioethics is in itself ethical work. Seen through the lived experience of alienation, it is a reflective practice of the moral tasks of presence, empathy, and hope. Though narrative methods further correct moral vision, commitment to a hermeneutical-narrative ethics maintains that vision.;Chapter six considers long-ranging implications of this approach for bioethics, medical school curricula, and the care of cancer patients. In better understanding the suffering of advanced stage cancer patients, we may better care for them. At the very least, we should realize how serious is our failure to understand.
机译:叙事生物伦理学是生物伦理学工作的核心。然而,叙事性生物伦理学的本质常常被误解,其询问方法有时被边缘化为医学人文学科或反理论批判。该项目探索对叙事性生物伦理学的当前误解如何导致对重病患者(尤其是晚期癌症患者)的宣传和护理中的盲点。这些患者中有许多遭受极大的困扰,导致深深的疏离感。从对异化生活经验的现象学-解释学研究的见识中汲取经验,该项目为叙述性解释-解释学生物伦理学的两层发展提供了初步的发展。更重要的是,这一特殊的叙事研究表明了对生命伦理学,医学培训和癌症患者护理的重大改变。在疏远患者的护理中,存在两种危害:由疾病及其治疗引起的第一危害和第二危害由解雇,隔离或拒绝患者痛苦引起的。换句话说,在晚期癌症患者中,人们对疏远的经历没有得到认可。在某种程度上,医疗护理忽略了这种破坏,否认了患者的人性。在某种程度上,医疗保健增加了这种破坏感,它违反了医学实践中最基本的道德要求:无害。由于医护人员会使患者疏远恶化,因此造成了第二种伤害。第一章考虑了晚期癌症患者的痛苦,以及为什么在医疗保健中忽视了患者疏远。第二,由于对生物伦理​​工作的误解,生物伦理反思中出现了第二个盲点。博物学家对生物伦理​​学的观点认为,通过确定科学和形式合理性所定义的合法知识,可以限制叙事生物伦理学的实践。这种观点的结果是,对于人类经验和价值知识所必需的解释性探究被放在一边。解释性探究不仅定义了叙事生物伦理学,而且对于解决此类患者的深重痛苦也至关重要。第二章重新考虑了叙事生物伦理学和方法的定义。第三章在理解生活经验时考虑了叙事知识,现象学描述和解释学解释。经验,价值和意义是叙事知识的核心。现象学和解释学方法为各种形式的叙事分析中使用的方法提供了额外的工具。通过阅读和写作的沉思反思可以使人们理解受苦者的关系现实。第四章探讨了异化的经历,这种经历始于Zerrissenheit,它使患者疏远,唤起了一种超现实的质量,使患者错位,扰乱了时间和身体的体验,使人与自我,他人和神灵隔离。它不是一个“遥远的悲伤”酒吧。这种反思暗示了解释学叙事伦理学的轮廓。第五章从伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯(Emmanuel Levinas),马丁·布伯(Martin Buber)和加布里埃尔·马塞尔(Gabriel Marcel)汲取灵感,强调了在道德工作的常规模型中未开发的要素:遭遇和道德诉求(存在),诠释性反思(同情)和道德任务(希望)。本质上,叙事生物伦理本身就是伦理工作。从疏远的生活经验来看,这是对存在,同情和希望的道德任务的反思性实践。尽管叙事方法进一步纠正了道德观念,但对诠释性叙事伦理的承诺仍保持了这一观念。第六章考虑了这种方法对生物伦理​​学,医学院课程和癌症患者护理的长期影响。为了更好地了解晚期癌症患者的痛苦,我们可能会更好地照顾他们。至少,我们应该认识到我们的不理解有多严重。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hinze, Barbara Ann.;

  • 作者单位

    Saint Louis University.;

  • 授予单位 Saint Louis University.;
  • 学科 Medical ethics.;Oncology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 340 p.
  • 总页数 340
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号