首页> 外文学位 >This Is Not a Painting: Post Modernism and Painting: For the Humanity
【24h】

This Is Not a Painting: Post Modernism and Painting: For the Humanity

机译:这不是绘画:后现代主义与绘画:为了人类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My research intends to explore the ongoing path of contemporary painting through the lenses of architecture, literature, and techne in terms of both methodology and the filter of Eastern philosophical ideas, such as a void and relationships, as expressed in cultural history. In academics, I initially studied English Literature with passionate academic enthusiasm (I learned many poems and read multiple theses pertaining to architecture while attending classes in architecture, French literature, and German literature). As MoMA provides opportunities for studying architecture, fashion and literature, I want to explore the different ways in which certain new trends in the visual arts are now erasing the definite lines between fine art and art of daily life, painting and other mediums, Eastern and Western, and North Korea and South Korea.;My trial to amalgamate all visual and aural language is inspired by my denial of the proposition "This is not a painting", which I believe is both a preposterous and a controversial idea. The process includes the grafting of painting on different characters. After Clement Greenberg's dogma era, painting was no longer a matter of trends or story subject matter. The form of painting changes for each generation; however, the content still stresses humanity.;For example, Rene Magritte drew a pipe and captioned it, "This is not a pipe". There are two seminal ideas here in Rene Magritte's image of a pipe. The first refers to the relationship between painting and language. The second refers to the relationship between painting and artistic representation. Painting starts from language, but it then evolves to become a visual expression. Thus, a painting can become a mirror image interpreted by its painter's eyes and ideas, not an actual representation of reality. An expansion of the visual language of contemporary painting' is not a problem of image content, but rather it is a problem emanating from "a way of seeing", "a way of thinking", and the lens or filter that is employed to "interpret" that image thusly.;As Magritte believed, the linguistic assumption that one paints to expand the territory of pictorial language, but then asserts that this image is not a painting, is an attempt to engender different things by adding, dividing, multiplying, and subtracting other visual idioms, thereby stressing the correlation between other visual language and the act of painting. However, that change is a form of painting after all. This view is meaningful in that it is an attempt to discover the possibility of integrating painting with other mediums to rediscover the indispensable, eternal value of painting through a contradictory process wherein the denial of a preposition after all turns new attention to the affirmation of that same preposition. What has changed in this painting is not the content or theme, but its form. The mission of post-modern painting was indeed to change its form.;Painting is not simply an expression of one-sided thought and emotion completed by individual artists. Viewers are expected to see painting from integration rather than judging that painting's specificity which has been shattered in contemporary art. Paradoxically, through the processes of hybridizing, different stage setting, I suggest that the essence of painting is the revival of humanity. The zeitgeist (spirit of the times) yearns for a Renaissance (rebirth). It is a Re-Renaissance that is needed for especially for post-modern people who crave humanity.;This paper is of significance in that it is an exploration of painting's identity and new orientation. That is, it is intended to explore the nature and value of painting through a comparative, amalgamative study into other forms of visual and aural language. This is also to consider what new perspectives can be employed to figure out painting's peculiarity as a medium in terms of cultural history, and how painting assumes the role of a precursor couched in different visual languages in terms of form.
机译:我的研究旨在通过建筑学,文学和技术的角度,从方法论和文化史上所表达的东方哲学思想(例如虚无和关系)的筛选出发,探索当代绘画的发展之路。在学术界,我最初以热情的学术热情学习了英语文学(在上建筑,法国文学和德国文学课程时,我学了很多诗,读了许多有关建筑的论文)。由于现代艺术博物馆(MoMA)提供了学习建筑,时尚和文学的机会,我想探索视觉艺术的某些新趋势现在以不同的方式消除美术与日常生活,绘画以及其他媒介,东方和东方之间的界限。西方,朝鲜和韩国。;我尝试合并所有视觉和听觉语言的尝试是受到我对“这不是一幅画”的主张的否定的启发,我认为这是一个荒谬而又引起争议的想法。该过程包括嫁接不同角色的绘画。在克莱门特·格林伯格的教条时代之后,绘画不再是趋势或故事主题的问题。绘画的形式每一代都在变化。但是,内容仍然强调人性。例如,雷内·马格利特(Rene Magritte)画了一个烟斗并加上了标题“这不是烟斗”。在勒内·马格利特(Rene Magritte)的烟斗形象中,有两个开创性的想法。首先是指绘画与语言之间的关系。第二种是绘画与艺术表现之间的关系。绘画从语言开始,但随后演变成一种视觉表达。因此,一幅画可以成为画家的眼睛和思想所解释的镜像,而不是现实的真实表示。 “当代绘画视觉语言的扩展”不是图像内容的问题,而是源于“观看方式”,“思考方式”以及用于“正如马格利特(Magritte)所相信的那样,一种语言假设是人们绘画以扩大绘画语言的领土,但随后断言该图像不是绘画,这是通过加,除,乘,并减去其他视觉习语,从而强调其他视觉语言与绘画行为之间的相关性。但是,这种改变毕竟是一种绘画形式。这种观点是有意义的,因为它试图通过一种矛盾的过程来发现将绘画与其他媒介相结合的可能性,以重新发现绘画的不可或缺的永恒价值,在这种过程中,介词的否定最终引起了人们对同一种绘画的肯定。介词。这幅画中改变的不是内容或主题,而是其形式。后现代绘画的任务的确是改变其形式。绘画不仅是单个艺术家完成的单方面思想和情感的表达。希望观众从融合中看画,而不是判断画的特殊性已被当代艺术所打破。矛盾的是,通过不同阶段设置的混合过程,我认为绘画的本质是人类的复兴。时代精神(时代精神)渴望复兴(重生)。这是一种文艺复兴,特别是对于渴望人类的后现代人而言是必需的。;本文的意义在于,它是对绘画身份和新方向的探索。也就是说,它旨在通过对其他形式的视觉和听觉语言进行比较,融合的研究来探索绘画的本质和价值。这也是在考虑可以采用哪些新观点来说明绘画作为文化历史媒介的特殊性,以及绘画如何在形式上承担以不同视觉语言表达的先驱角色。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lee, Sunyoung.;

  • 作者单位

    Syracuse University.;

  • 授予单位 Syracuse University.;
  • 学科 Fine arts.;Art criticism.;Art history.
  • 学位 M.F.A.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 29 p.
  • 总页数 29
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号