首页> 外文学位 >Non-propositional knowledge in Plato and Wittgenstein.
【24h】

Non-propositional knowledge in Plato and Wittgenstein.

机译:柏拉图和维特根斯坦的非命题知识。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the Blue Book, Wittgenstein explicitly opposes his own method of philosophical investigation to that of Socrates, who will not accept a list of examples even as a preliminary answer to his 'what-is-x' question. Relying on Meno and the Seventh Letter however, I will provide an interpretation of Plato's epistemic priority principle that does away with the assumption that what Socrates seeks is the uniquely correct definition of x. Following the work of Fransisco J. Gonzalez, I will argue that the philosopher seeks knowledge of x itself and that this knowledge is non-propositional. An interesting result is that Plato and Wittgenstein turn out to have extremely similar conceptions of philosophy. In particular, I argue that the distinction between doxa and episteme in Plato should be understood along the lines of Wittgenstein's distinction between saying and showing.
机译:在《蓝皮书》中,维特根斯坦明确反对他自己的哲学研究方法,而反对苏格拉底的方法,苏格拉底不接受任何例子,甚至不能作为他对“ what-is-x”问题的初步回答。但是,根据梅诺和第七封信,我将提供对柏拉图的认知优先原则的解释,该原则消除了苏格拉底寻求的唯一正确的x定义。在弗朗西斯科·J·冈萨雷斯(Fransisco J. Gonzalez)的工作之后,我将辩称哲学家寻求x本身的知识,而该知识是非命题的。一个有趣的结果是,柏拉图和维特根斯坦的哲学观念极为相似。特别是,我认为,柏拉图中的doxa和episteme之间的区别应该按照维特根斯坦在说和显示之间的区别来理解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fryer, Ian David.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Victoria (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Victoria (Canada).;
  • 学科 Philosophy.Education Philosophy of.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 93 p.
  • 总页数 93
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号