首页> 外文学位 >Hoax literature: Reading Edgar Allan Poe, Herman Melville, and Mark Twain.
【24h】

Hoax literature: Reading Edgar Allan Poe, Herman Melville, and Mark Twain.

机译:恶作剧文学:读埃德加·爱伦·坡,赫曼·梅尔维尔和马克·吐温。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study seeks to provide a new critical appreciation of the writings of Edgar Allan Poe, Herman Melville, and Mark Twain in particular, and a new thinking of literature more generally, through an elaboration of what I call "hoax literature." Bringing together the mischievous, duplicitous, strange aspects of literature with questions of the "real," what is true, "in the world," and the non-fictional, hoax literature becomes a way of conceiving what Maurice Blanchot characterizes as literature's contestatory power along with what Jacques Derrida refers to literature's "suspended relation to meaning and reference." The dissertation is especially indebted to Blanchot's little-discussed but powerful essay "The Great Hoax" (1957), with its emphasis on the inextricableness of experience from the insidiousness of an all-encompassing deception, as well as to Jacques Derrida's various readings of literature in terms of democracy, sovereignty, and the secret. There is a mischievousness in Poe, Melville, and Twain, I argue, that calls to be understood in terms of a logic of counter-hoax. Through readings of "The Angel of the Odd," "The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar," "The Fall of the House of Usher," and other texts, I suggest that Poe was not only a "hoax" writer but also the first producer of hoax literature and first figure in American literature effectively to theorize a notion of "the great hoax" in literary works. This argument is deepened and refined through an extensive encounter with the writings of Melville, especially Typee, Moby-Dick, Pierre, "Benito Cereno," The Confidence-Man, and Billy Budd. I elaborate a Melvillean "poetics of the hoax," in order to analyze the singular ways in which figures of confidence and confiding, tricks and traps, deception, queerness, and an uneasy irony threaten to confound our sense of what is non-literary, real, true, historical. Finally, Mark Twain's work is read as at once a step back from the intricacies of Melville's writing and a perhaps unprecedentedly direct exposure of the "great hoax," particularly in terms of slavery and American nationalism. Attention is given to Twain's early journalistic hoaxes, "Mental Telegraphy," Pudd'nhead Wilson, "Those Extraordinary Twins," and "The Mysterious Stranger."
机译:这项研究旨在通过阐述我所谓的“骗局文学”,对埃德加·爱伦·坡,赫尔曼·梅尔维尔和马克·吐温的著作给予新的批判性评价,并从更广泛的意义上对文学提出新的看法。通过“真实”,“真实”,“在世界上”的问题,将调皮,重复,奇怪的文学方面结合起来,而非虚构的骗局文学成为一种理解莫里斯·布兰科特表征为文学竞争力的方式以及雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)所指的文学“对意义和指称的悬浮关系”。该论文特别赞扬布兰科特(Blanchart)鲜为人知但有力的论文《大骗局》(The Great Hoax)(1957),着重强调了无所不包的欺骗所带来的经验的不可分割性,以及雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)对文学的各种解读在民主,主权和秘密方面。我认为,在Poe,Melville和Twain中有一种调皮的作风,要求以反骗局的逻辑来理解。通过阅读“奇异的天使”,“瓦尔德马尔案中的事实”,“厄舍尔之家的陷落”和其他文本,我建议坡不仅是“骗局”的作家,而且也是也是骗局文学的第一生产者和美国文学中的第一人物,有效地理论化了文学作品中的“大骗局”概念。通过与梅尔维尔的著作,尤其是Typee,Moby-Dick,Pierre,“ Benito Cereno”,“ Confidence-Man”和Billy Budd的广泛接触,使这一论点得到了深化和完善。我详细阐述了梅尔维尔(Melvillean)的“恶作剧诗学”,以分析信任和倾诉人物,诡计与陷阱,欺骗,古怪和不安讽刺性人物威胁我们混淆非文学性的单一方式,真实,真实,历史。最后,马克·吐温的作品被解读为与梅尔维尔的错综复杂以及“巨大骗局”的前所未有的直接接触背道而驰,特别是在奴隶制和美国民族主义方面。吐温早期的新闻恶作剧引起了人们的注意,它们涉及“心理电报”,“普德黑德·威尔逊”,“那些非凡的双胞胎”和“神秘的陌生人”。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 American Studies.;Literature American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 345 p.
  • 总页数 345
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号