首页> 外文学位 >Obscurity, blackness, and the making of the Harlem Renaissance, 1919-present.
【24h】

Obscurity, blackness, and the making of the Harlem Renaissance, 1919-present.

机译:晦涩,黑暗和哈莱姆文艺复兴时期(1919年至今)的创作。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although we generally use "Harlem Renaissance" to refer to African American cultural production of the 1920s and 1930s, this concept, as we are familiar with it today, is far more recent. In my dissertation, I consider the ex-post facto "making" of the Harlem Renaissance. From its inception in the 1920s, the Renaissance (initially the "Negro" and then "Harlem" Renaissance) has been an unstable but politically useful category for defining blackness. First popularized by Alain Locke in The New Negro (1925), the term was imagined to encourage, coordinate, and package an unprecedented burst of Negro writing, painting, music, and drama in an effort towards political and social equality. Between the late-1930s and the present, subsequent generations have continually returned to the concept of the Renaissance, re-shaping the field to respond to contemporary issues and to promote certain versions of African American identity, often in an attempt to challenge America's enduring racism. However, especially during the 1960s and 1970s, the Harlem Renaissance became increasingly narrow, and a substantial body of African American writing and art from the period was obscured, written out largely in order to consolidate "authentic" blackness and demonstrate the clear existence of tradition. Certain non-conforming authors, texts, bodies, performances, genres, events, and geographies were trimmed from the prevailing Renaissance narrative. My dissertation, in theorizing obscurity and recovering specific sites of persisting neglect, considers the politics of cultural memory, and how, why, and at what cost such erasure has occurred. Ultimately, I argue that the concept of the Renaissance, its canon, and its relationship to African American literature and American racial paradigms has revealed as much about the needs of the attending generation as it has informed us about the art and culture of the 1920s and 1930s.
机译:尽管我们通常使用“哈林复兴”来指代1920年代和1930年代的非裔美国人的文化产物,但正如我们今天所熟悉的那样,这一概念是最近的。在我的论文中,我考虑了哈林文艺复兴时期的事后“制造”。从1920年代开始,文艺复兴时期(最初是“黑人”,然后是“哈林”文艺复兴时期)一直是不稳定的类别,但在政治上对黑度的定义很有用。这个词最初由阿兰·洛克(Alain Locke)在《新黑人》(The New Negro,1925年)中广为使用,旨在鼓励,协调和包装史无前例的黑人写作,绘画,音乐和戏剧,以实现政治和社会平等。从1930年代末到现在,后代不断恢复文艺复兴的概念,重塑这一领域以应对当代问题并推广某些非裔美国人的身份,这通常是为了挑战美国的持久种族主义。但是,尤其是在1960年代和1970年代期间,哈林文艺复兴时期变得越来越狭窄,从那时起,大量的非裔美国人的文字和艺术就被遮掩了,主要是为了巩固“真实的”黑度并展示传统的清晰存在而写成的。 。某些不符合标准的作者,文本,正文,表演,体裁,事件和地域均从主流的文艺复兴时期叙述中删减。我的论文在理论上模糊化和恢复长期被忽视的特定场所时,考虑了文化记忆的政治,以及这种擦除的方式,原因和代价。最终,我认为文艺复兴的概念,经典及其与非裔美国人文学和美国种族范式的关系揭示了与会一代的需求,因为它已经使我们了解了1920年代的艺术和文化。 1930年代。

著录项

  • 作者

    Barwick, Milton Clark, III.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.;
  • 学科 Literature American.;American Studies.;African American Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 267 p.
  • 总页数 267
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号