首页> 外文学位 >Intraday market dynamics.
【24h】

Intraday market dynamics.

机译:盘中市场动态。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The revolutionary technological and regulatory changes in financial markets over the first few years of the new millennium have radically altered trading routines and strategies. Instead of human decisions, instructions that algorithms follow in order to locate liquidity, arbitrage opportunities, pattern detection, etc. determine the size and timing of transactions. As a result, individual transactions are far from reflecting economic decisions, and classical models of market microstructure may not be used to describe phenomena at transaction level.;I develop a novel aggregation approach that accounts for features modern markets; for a given stock, I identify successive sequences of transactions where cumulative dollar volume of each sequence is a fraction of previous month's market-capitalization plus a fixed dollar-amount. Time durations of these trade sequences measure trading activity, and the corresponding price changes reflect market impacts of a fixed dollar volume traded at variable intensities. With this approach I (a) control for the temporal dependence across individual transactions induced by dynamic order-splitting, (b) finely isolate different market conditions, e.g. volume spikes from low trading activity, (c) tell apart trading activity from trading volume, (d) reduce the effect of odd-lots bias that exists at transaction level, and (e) provide a measure of trading activity that helps us study intraday dynamics of trading activity and prices.;I first show that, for most stocks, price impacts of fixed dollar-positions significantly fall in trading activity. But price impacts and trading activity, on average, are endogenously determined: trading activity rises when liquidity (depth near good prices) is unusually high which presents itself as small price impacts. I then show that one can predict this variation using a simple instrument. Moreover, the relationships between price impacts (trading costs) and instrumented trading activity are very similar across differently-sized stocks post 2006, suggesting greater cross-stock homogeneity post RegNMS. In sharp contrast, greater heterogeneity obtains if one examines the levels of price impacts (trading costs): smaller (less liquid) stocks became less liquid post 2007, but the opposite holds for larger (more liquid) stocks. Using a CAMP that includes four Fama-French factors and key stock characteristics, I show that this divergence in liquidity is translated to greater liquidity premia post financial crisis. Findings indicate that the massive changes in the design of markets did not led to uniform improvements in stock liquidity and that the asymmetric evolution of liquidity across different stocks affected investment decisions.;I then begin to investigate the intraday dynamics of trading activity and price movements by contrasting two separate cases of changes in trading activity: I capture a relative increase in trading activity by a pair of successive trade sequences whose first sequences has a longer time durations---the opposite pattern reflects a decline in trading activity. I show that, surprisingly, increases in trading activity are associated with return momentum, but declines in trading activity are associated with price reversals. Return momentums are stronger when starting/concluding activity levels are higher and signed trades are less balanced. In sharp contrast, price reversals are stronger when starting/concluding activity levels are lower and signed trades are more balanced. I conclude that these patterns are liquidity driven, e.g. price reversals of falling activity reflects rewards to liquidity provision after a phase of high activity. I then document more interesting time of day patterns: while increases in trading activity are least likely in earlier trading hours, return momentum of rising activity is strongest at these times; similarly, while activity decrease are least likely near close price reversals of falling activity are strongest in later trading hours. These findings highlight the highly variable nature of trading over the course of trading day. Earlier hours witness execution of overnight trading decisions that raise trading activity and persistent price impacts. Later trading hours, however, feature lower competition to provide liquidity since traders target at closing positions; thus greater rewards to liquidity provision in expected.;I conclude my work by trying to model the dynamic structure of trading activity in the form I measure it. I employ the ACD models of Engle and Russell (1998) that were designed to model the time durations between individual transactions (inter-transaction durations). In today's markets, however, individual transactions are hard to reconcile with economic behavior. Thus, estimates of ACD models or any other dynamic structure that utilized inter-transaction durations have limited economic interpretations. An important contribution of my work is to introduce an alternative input to ACD models that fit features of modern financial markets and can provide a basis for economic interpretations. Moreover, my approach indirectly addresses other computations and statistical challenges one would face dealing with inter-transaction durations. Performing stock-year specific estimates of ACD models, I identify several interesting routes for future research. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).
机译:在新千年的头几年里,金融市场发生了革命性的技术和监管变化,从根本上改变了交易程序和策略。为了确定流动性,套利机会,模式检测等,算法遵循的指令决定了交易的规模和时机,而不是人为决定。结果,个体交易远不能反映经济决策,并且可能无法使用市场微观结构的经典模型来描述交易层面的现象。对于给定的股票,我确定了连续的交易序列,其中每个序列的累积美元交易量是上个月市值加上固定美元交易额的一部分。这些交易序列的持续时间可衡量交易活动,相应的价格变化反映了以可变强度交易的固定美元数量的市场影响。通过这种方法,我(a)控制由动态订单拆分引起的各个交易之间的时间依赖性,(b)很好地隔离不同的市场条件,例如低交易活动带来的交易量峰值;(c)区分交易活动与交易量;(d)减少交易水平上存在的奇数手差的影响;(e)提供衡量交易活动的方法,有助于我们研究盘中交易我首先表明,对于大多数股票来说,固定美元头寸的价格影响在交易活动中明显下降。但是,平均而言,价格影响和交易活动是由内生决定的:当流动性(接近良好价格的深度)异常高时,交易活动就会上升,这本身表现为价格影响很小。然后,我证明了可以使用一种简单的工具预测这种变化。此外,价格影响(交易成本)与工具交易活动之间的关系在2006年之后的不同规模的股票之间非常相似,这表明RegNMS之后的跨股票同质性更高。与之形成鲜明对比的是,如果人们考察价格影响的水平(交易成本),则异质性更大:2007年以后,较小(流动性较低)的股票流动性降低,而较大(流动性较高)的股票则相反。通过使用包含四个Fama-French因素和关键股票特征的CAMP,我证明了流动性的这种差异转化为金融危机后更大的流动性溢价。研究结果表明,市场设计的巨大变化并没有导致股票流动性的统一改善,而且不同股票之间流动性的不对称演变影响了投资决策。然后,我开始研究交易活动和价格变动的日内动态。对比了两个单独的交易活动变化情况:我通过一对连续的交易序列(其第一个序列的持续时间更长)捕获了交易活动的相对增加-相反的模式反映了交易活动的下降。我出乎意料地表明,交易活动的增加与回报势头有关,但是交易活动的减少与价格反转有关。当开始/结束活动水平较高且签名交易不平衡时,返回动量会更强。与之形成鲜明对比的是,当开始/结束活动水平较低且已签单交易更加平衡时,价格反转更明显。我得出结论,这些模式是流动性驱动的,例如活跃度下降的价格反转反映了活跃期结束后对流动性提供的奖励。然后,我记录了更有趣的日间时间模式:虽然在较早的交易时间内交易活动增加的可能性最小,但在这些时候,活动增加的回报势头最大。同样,虽然活动减少的可能性很小,但在随后的交易时间内,活动下降的收盘价逆转最明显。这些发现强调了交易日内交易的高度可变性。早些时候见证了隔夜交易决策的执行,从而增加了交易活动和持续的价格影响。但是,由于交易者将目标定在平仓头寸,因此稍后的交易时间具有竞争性较低,无法提供流动性;因此,我期望通过对交易活动的动态结构进行建模来结束我的工作。我采用了Engle和Russell(1998)的ACD模型,该模型旨在对单个交易之间的持续时间进行建模(交互交易持续时间)。但是,在当今的市场中,个人交易很难与经济行为相吻合。从而,利用交易间持续时间的ACD模型或任何其他动态结构的估算对经济的解释有限。我的工作的重要贡献是将ACD模型的替代输入引入适合现代金融市场的特征,并可以为经济解释提供基础。而且,我的方法间接地解决了处理交互时间的其他计算和统计难题。通过对ACD模型进行股票年度特定的估计,我确定了一些有趣的途径以进行未来研究。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Heydari Barardehi, Yashar.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Finance.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 192 p.
  • 总页数 192
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号