首页> 外文学位 >Building Bridges Where There is Nothing Left to Burn: The Campaign for Environmental Justice in a Southwest Detroit Border Community.
【24h】

Building Bridges Where There is Nothing Left to Burn: The Campaign for Environmental Justice in a Southwest Detroit Border Community.

机译:在无人烧毁的地方建造桥梁:西南底特律边境社区的环境正义运动。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the nature of power in land use decisions that contribute to the production of environmental inequality. By analyzing land use conflicts concerning who decides, who profits, and who pays when it comes to the construction of urban infrastructure, I identify mechanisms that culminate in the disproportionate placement of hazardous facilities in low-income communities of color. Specifically, by tracing decisions about the plan to build a new international border crossing in the Southwest Detroit neighborhood of Delray, I demonstrate how economic and political inequalities incentivize the placement of locally undesirable land uses (LULUs) in low-income, vulnerable communities. I examine three phases of the decision-making process: the initial proposal regarding where to place the facility, the response by the host community, and the negotiation process involved in responding to the community's concerns. Drawing from fieldwork, interviews with residents, activists, and elected officials, and an analysis of media coverage, I explain the emergence of the Southwest Detroit Community Benefits Coalition and why local stakeholders organized to conditionally support the new bridge, rather than oppose it, despite fears about contamination and relocation. I argue that the campaign for a community benefits agreement (CBA) resulted from a legacy of divestment and industrialization within the neighborhood, combined with the belief that residents lacked the political power to prevent the construction. Thus, a "not-in-my-backyard" (NIMBY) campaign was effectively organized out of the political process, despite concerns about health impacts. I then trace the community benefits campaign, illuminating mechanisms through which the Delray group was manipulated, tokenized, and silenced. Nearly all of the extant literature on CBAs draws its sample of cases from neighborhoods that are in the process of or have successfully completed a CBA negotiation. No existing research has examined the power dynamics that shape a community's ability to compel the developer to negotiate in the first place. By entering the community at an earlier policy-making state, I am able to demonstrate how political and economic inequalities contribute to environmental inequality. The dissertation closes with suggestions for how communities and policy-makers can more effectively prevent the reproduction of environmental injustice.
机译:本文探讨了土地使用决策中权力的性质,这种权力是造成环境不平等的原因。通过分析涉及谁来决定,谁来盈利,谁来支付城市基础设施建设方面的土地使用冲突,我确定了导致危险设施在低收入有色社区中比例过高的机制。具体而言,通过追踪有关在西南底特律德拉市(Delray)附近建立新的国际边境口岸的计划的决策,我展示了经济和政治不平等如何激励低收入,脆弱社区中当地不良土地利用(LULU)的放置。我研究了决策过程的三个阶段:关于将设施放置在何处的初始建议,东道国社区的回应以及涉及社区关注问题的谈判过程。通过实地调查,对居民,活动家和民选官员的采访以及对媒体报道的分析,我解释了西南底特律社区福利联盟的出现,以及为何当地利益相关者组织起来有条件地支持而不是反对这座新桥,尽管担心污染和搬迁。我认为,社区福利协议(CBA)的运动源于邻里撤资和工业化的遗产,再加上人们认为居民缺乏阻止建筑的政治权力的信念。因此,尽管担心健康,但在政治进程之外有效地组织了“在我的后院”运动。然后,我追踪社区福利运动,阐明Delray小组通过其操纵,标记和沉默的机制。几乎所有有关CBA的现有文献都是从正在进行CBA谈判或已经成功完成CBA谈判的社区中抽取案例的。没有任何现有的研究研究过权力动态,这种权力动态影响着社区迫使开发商进行谈判的能力。通过以较早的决策状态进入社区,我能够证明政治和经济上的不平等如何导致环境不平等。论文最后提出了有关社区和政策制定者如何更有效地防止环境不公正现象再生产的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Krings, Amy Erin.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Social work.;Urban planning.;Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 128 p.
  • 总页数 128
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号