首页> 外文会议> >Congestion Pricing and Environmental Justice: Research Conducted for an Environmental Justice Analysis of Tolling on the SR 520 Bridge in Seattle
【24h】

Congestion Pricing and Environmental Justice: Research Conducted for an Environmental Justice Analysis of Tolling on the SR 520 Bridge in Seattle

机译:拥挤定价和环境正义:针对西雅图SR 520桥收费的环境正义分析进行的研究

获取原文

摘要

In addition to providing funding for our aging transportation infrastructure, congestionpricing can improve traffic flow, safety, and trip reliability. Given these benefits, morestates are exploring congestion pricing.There is concern, however, about the potential unintended consequences of congestionpricing on low-income people, who may not be able to afford the tolls. Will un-tolledalternatives, such as riding transit or taking an alternate route add too much travel timeand distance to be viable options? Will low-income people have a credit or debit accountto establish or replenish an account for an electronic transponder? Will limited-Englishproficient people understand how to obtain a transponder or use the system? There is verylittle data to answer these questions.Environmental Justice guides states to evaluate the potential adverse effects of highwayprojects on low-income and minority people. The stakes are high: transportation officialsneed to be able to more definitively answer questions about the equity of congestionpricing from policymakers and the public, or risk lawsuits and costly delays to theirprojects. Reliable data can also provide sound foundation for meaningful mitigation,should it be necessary.Because environmental justice is an emerging science, however, states are wrestling withhow to evaluate the effects of congestion pricing on low-income and minoritypopulations. Typically, to conduct an environmental justice analysis on a highwayproject, we examine the environment within a specified distance from the project limits,because the project effects – such as increased noise or traffic – should not extend fartherthan this. Because tolling a roadway or bridge will affect users of the facility as much asit will affect the environment around it, we must supplement the conventional approachwhen we conduct an environmental justice analysis of a tolled facility.At the request of the Washington State Department of Transportation, PRR, a multidisciplinarypublic affairs firm, developed a methodology for conducting anenvironmental justice analysis of tolled facilities. We used this approach in ourevaluation of the effects of tolling the SR 520 Bridge on low-income and minoritypeople.This paper will present:1. Our research methodology, which includes a transit intercept survey, telephonesurvey, and focus groups with SR 520 Bridge users;2. Applying our findings to an environmental justice analysis; and3. Recommendations for next steps in evaluating the effects of congestion pricing onenvironmental justice populations.
机译:除了为我们老化的交通基础设施提供资金外,交通拥堵 定价可以改善交通流量,安全性和旅行可靠性。有了这些好处,更多 各州正在探索交通拥堵定价。 然而,令人担忧的是,交通拥堵可能带来意想不到的后果 针对可能无法负担通行费的低收入人群进行定价。将不收费 其他选择,例如乘坐公交或走替代路线,会增加旅行时间 和距离是可行的选择?低收入者会拥有贷方或借方帐户吗 建立或补充电子应答器的帐户?请问英语 精通人员了解如何获取应答器或使用系统?有非常 很少有数据可以回答这些问题。 环境司法部指导各州评估高速公路的潜在不利影响 针对低收入和少数民族的项目。赌注很高:交通运输官员 需要能够更明确地回答有关拥塞公平性的问题 政策制定者和公众的定价,否则可能会面临法律诉讼和代价高昂的延误 项目。可靠的数据还可以为有效的缓解措施打下坚实的基础, 必要时。 但是,由于环境正义是一门新兴科学,因此各州都在努力 如何评估拥堵定价对低收入和少数族裔的影响 人口。通常,在高速公路上进行环境正义分析 项目,我们会在距项目限制规定距离之内检查环境, 因为项目影响(例如增加的噪音或交通)不应扩展得更远 比这个。因为向道路或桥梁收费会影响设施的使用者 它会影响周围的环境,我们必须补充传统方法 当我们对收费设施进行环境正义分析时。 应华盛顿州交通运输部(PRR)的要求,多学科 公共事务公司,开发了一种方法来进行 收费设施的环境正义分析。我们在我们的方法中使用了这种方法 SR 520桥收费对低收入和少数民族的影响的评估 人们。 本文将介绍: 1.我们的研究方法,包括过境拦截调查,电话 与SR 520 Bridge用户进行调查并进行焦点小组讨论; 2.将我们的发现应用于环境正义分析;和 3.评估拥堵定价对经济增长的影响的下一步建议 环境正义人口。

著录项

  • 来源
    《》|2009年|p.1-19|共19页
  • 会议地点
  • 作者

    JAMIE STRAUSZ;

  • 作者单位
  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 交通运输经济;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-26 14:59:19

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号