首页> 外文学位 >The Betrayal of Brown v. Board of Education: How Brown's Promise is Unfulfilled and What it Says About the Continuing Problem of Race in Education.
【24h】

The Betrayal of Brown v. Board of Education: How Brown's Promise is Unfulfilled and What it Says About the Continuing Problem of Race in Education.

机译:布朗诉教育委员会的背叛:布朗的承诺是如何兑现的以及它对教育种族持续存在的问题的看法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As we stand on the cusp of another Supreme Court opinion concerning the use of racial considerations in education from Fisher v. University of Texas, the Court's final verdict may potentially be another set back for affirmative action policies in education. However, the historical trajectory of the Court's approach to racial issues in and beyond education suggests a more critical assessment of legal moments such as Fisher is needed. That is, Fisher must be placed within a historical racial narrative carefully orchestrated by the Court. The Court's racial narrative adjudicates social cleavages on race in areas such as voting rights, employment law, criminal justice, and education. A comprehensive engagement of the Court's discursive trajectory on race is necessary in order to accurately understand the significance of Fisher in the aftermath of Brown v. Board of Education. Without an engagement of the Court's previous moments, our understanding of Fisher's significance becomes limited and trapped within the mainstream colorblind racial narrative that all but dismisses the salience of racial subordination in society. This study will show that by engaging the Court's long and unfortunate history adjudicating racial issues, white privilege and whiteness has been protected and perpetuated by the Court's powerful authority. Furthermore, regardless of Fisher's outcome, an engagement of how the Court has defined, protected, and perpetuated whiteness will fundamentally understand Fisher not only as a defeat or victory for racial considerations in education, but as an instantiation of the continuing problem of race in society. As a result, the persistence of racial subordination in the 'colorblind' era is anything but coincidental.
机译:当我们站在最高法院关于费舍尔诉德克萨斯大学诉教育中使用种族考量的另一种观点的风口浪尖时,法院的最终判决可能会在教育方面采取平权行动政策。但是,法院处理教育内外的种族问题的历史轨迹表明,需要对诸如Fisher的法律时刻进行更为严格的评估。也就是说,费舍尔必须置于法院精心策划的历史种族叙述中。法院的种族叙事裁定在投票权,雇佣法,刑事司法和教育等领域中种族之间的社会分歧。为了准确理解费舍尔在布朗诉教育委员会案后的重要性,必须全面参与法院关于种族的话语轨迹。如果没有法院以前的参与,我们对费舍尔意义的理解就变得有限,并陷入主流色盲种族叙事中,而这种叙事几乎消除了社会中种族从属的重要性。这项研究将表明,通过参与法院漫长而不幸的历史来裁定种族问题,白人的特权和白人地位受到了法院强大权力的保护和延续。此外,无论费舍尔的结果如何,参与法院如何定义,保护和永久保留白人都会从根本上理解费舍尔不仅是教育中种族考量的失败或胜利,而且是社会中持续种族问题的实例。 。结果,“色盲”时代种族从属的持续存在绝非偶然。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tran, Hoang Vu.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Education policy.;Education history.;Educational sociology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 107 p.
  • 总页数 107
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号