首页> 外文学位 >AN EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF ESTIMATING THE STANDARD DEVIATION OF JOB PERFORMANCE TO DETERMINE THE UTILITY OF A TEST IN A FIXED-TREATMENT SEQUENTIAL EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCESS.
【24h】

AN EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF ESTIMATING THE STANDARD DEVIATION OF JOB PERFORMANCE TO DETERMINE THE UTILITY OF A TEST IN A FIXED-TREATMENT SEQUENTIAL EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCESS.

机译:估算作业固定绩效员工选择过程中测试效用的标准绩效评估方法的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The utility of organizational selection procedures has become of increasing interest as the costs associated with selection programs continue to increase. The major difficulty associated with utility analysis appears to have been estimating the standard deviation of job performance in dollar terms (SDy).;The organizational setting for this study was a large multi-branch Bank. The people involved in this study were low tenure Tellers hired in part by the selection procedure under investigation, Head Tellers, and Branch/District Managers employed by this Bank.;The results of this study indicated significant differences by organizational level in the estimates of SDy. The accounting estimate of SDy corresponded only to the estimates made by the Branch/District Managers. The accounting estimates of individual output did not correspond to the estimates of individual value made by Head Tellers. The estimated utility of the selection procedure was shown to vary considerably depending on which estimates were used for the parameters in the equation for assessing utility.;These results indicated that the subjective method of estimating SDy might not be the optimal solution for utility analysis. Specific recommendations are made to investigate the process by which these estimates of SDy are made. Further, limitations in the current theorizing of the potential impact of selection programs on productivity are discussed.;This study investigated whether: (1) there were differences in the estimates of SDy derived from different organizational levels using a subjective approach for estimating SDy, (2) the subjective judgment method for estimating SDy was associated with an accounting estimate of SDy, (3) an accounting criterion of individual output corresponded to an estimate of individual employee value made by supervisors using a variation of the subjective methodology of estimating SDy, and (4) estimated the utility of a selection procedure currently in use by the organization.
机译:随着与选拔计划相关的成本不断增加,组织选拔程序的实用性越来越引起人们的关注。与效用分析相关的主要困难似乎是以美元为单位来估计工作绩效的标准差(SDy)。这项研究的组织机构是大型的多分支银行。这项研究涉及的人员是低年限出纳员,部分是通过调查程序选择的,他们是本行雇用的总出纳员和分行/区经理。该研究的结果表明,在SDy的估算中,各组织水平存在显着差异。 SDy的会计估计仅对应于分支机构/区域经理的估计。个人产出的会计估计与总柜员的个人价值估计不符。结果表明,选择程序的估计效用会显着不同,具体取决于用于评估效用的方程式中的参数所用的估计值。这些结果表明,估计SDy的主观方法可能不是效用分析的最佳解决方案。提出了具体建议,以调查进行SDy估算的过程。进一步,讨论了选择理论对生产率的潜在影响的当前理论上的局限性;该研究调查了是否:(1)使用主观估计SDy的方法从不同组织层次得出的SDy估计中存在差异,( 2)用于估计SDy的主观判断方法与SDy的会计估计相关联;(3)个人产出的会计准则与主管使用估计SDy的主观方法的变化得出的个人雇员价值的估计相对应,并且(4)估计组织当前正在使用的选择程序的效用。

著录项

  • 作者

    MAYER, ROBERT STEVEN.;

  • 作者单位

    Wayne State University.;

  • 授予单位 Wayne State University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1982
  • 页码 188 p.
  • 总页数 188
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号