首页> 外文学位 >SCHOOLING IN INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY: A CRITICAL STUDY ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY AND CULTURAL CAPITAL THEORIES IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION.
【24h】

SCHOOLING IN INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY: A CRITICAL STUDY ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY AND CULTURAL CAPITAL THEORIES IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION.

机译:在工业社会中上学:对教育社会学中的政治经济和文化资本理论的批判性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study has been a critical evaluation of the political economy theory of Bowles and Gintis and the cultural capital theory of Bourdieu. The major intent has been to determine the potentials and/or limitations of these two theories to provide an adequate theoretical framework to explain the dynamics and role of the formal schooling in industrial society. The study has been conducted in six chapters.The two theories in different ways argue that schooling in contemporary society serves to legitimize and reproduce the class structure of society. The two theories tend to complement each other in a general structural framework which can advance theory and research in the sociology of education. Limitations in each theory have been examined and theoretically clarified. It has been argued that such a structural framework should be supplemented by the work of culturalist and "new" sociologists.In the first chapter T. Kuhn's theory has been discussed and criticized, and a critical perspective of sociology of knowledge has been articulated and utilized to understand the current development of the sociology of education. Upon this discussion the problem of the study has been articulated. In the second chapter a critical model for evaluation of social theory has been articulated on the critical theory in social science of J. Habermas, K. O. Apel, M. Fay, and J. D. House. The positivist model of evaluation has been discussed and rejected scientifically and ideologically. The critical model of evaluation provided a conception of theory-structure and criteria for evaluation. According to the critical model the two theories have been presented in the third and fourth chapters. In the fifth chapter the two theories (1) have been compared and juxtaposed to each other, and (2) discussed and analyzed in light of theory and research in the conflict/critical paradigm. The sixth chapter has been a summarization and conclusion.
机译:这项研究是对鲍尔斯和金蒂斯的政治经济学理论以及布迪厄的文化资本理论的批判性评价。主要目的是确定这两种理论的潜力和/或局限性,以提供适当的理论框架来解释正规教育在工业社会中的动态和作用。该研究共分六章。两种理论以不同的方式认为,当代社会中的学校教育有助于使社会的阶级结构合法化和再现。两种理论倾向于在一个可以促进教育社会学理论和研究的总体结构框架中相互补充。每个理论的局限性都已经过研究并在理论上得到了澄清。有人认为,这种结构框架应由文化学家和“新”社会学家的工作加以补充。在第一章中,对库恩的理论进行了讨论和批评,并阐明和利用了知识社会学的批判视角。了解教育社会学的当前发展。在讨论之后,已经阐明了研究的问题。在第二章中,针对社会理论的批判模型阐述了J. Habermas,K。O. Apel,M。Fay和J. D. House的社会科学批评理论。评价的实证主义模型在科学上和思想上都已被讨论和拒绝。评价的关键模型提供了理论结构和评价标准的概念。根据临界模型,在第三章和第四章中介绍了两种理论。在第五章中,将两种理论(1)进行了比较和并置,(2)根据冲突/批判范式的理论和研究进行了讨论和分析。第六章是总结和总结。

著录项

  • 作者

    EL-BILAWI, HASSAN H.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pittsburgh.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pittsburgh.;
  • 学科 Education General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1982
  • 页码 281 p.
  • 总页数 281
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号