首页> 外文学位 >A COMPARISON OF RELATIVE RATES OF RETURN ON PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PENSION FUNDS.
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF RELATIVE RATES OF RETURN ON PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PENSION FUNDS.

机译:私人和公共养老金基金相对收益率的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of the relative performance of a private and a public plan. Using a sample of faculty of Clark University, a systematic analysis of the Social Security benefits and TIAA/CREF lead us to conclude that the benefits associated with Social Security have a much higher replacement ration than TIAA/CREF.;After the Automatic Adjustment Act of 1972, the Social Security, provided individual retirees with an inflation proof benefit whereas the benefits of the private plans have been very sensitive to price changes. The private plans offer individuals a fixed stream of income which is quite vulnerable to inflation. Hence, in recent years people have been heavily relying on the Social Security benefits. Since the Social Security is currently facing a serious financial strain, a number of recommendations have been made to improve the benefit structure of the private plans in order to alleviate some of these difficulties.;Another important issue that is in mind of anyone saving for retirement years especially those employees of colleges and universities, etc. is the risk associated in making these savings. During the past twenty five years the TIAA has had a very moderate return with a low degree of variation. In contrast to this CREF has had a high mean return with a very large variance. The question is whether one should go after a high return or low risk. This, of course, depends on the individual, whether risk lover, risk neutral or risk avertor. A theoretical model has been constructed to examine this question and offer the most efficient portfolio.;Finally, after estimating the rates of return for TIAA and CREF for future, a measure of efficiency called "replacement ratio" was constructed and used to evaluate the performance of these plans as well as Social Security. The findings of this paper show that the Social Security currently provides individuals with a much higher replacement ration than TIAA/CREF, and the fact that its benefits are inflation proof suggests that the future of the private plans depends on their ability to protect retirees from inflation.;The Social Security system initially was designed to provide individuals a retirement benefit floor rather than an income replacement, it now figures more prominently than private plans in total retirement income.
机译:本文的目的是提供对私人计划和公共计划的相对绩效的分析。使用克拉克大学的一个样本,对社会保障福利和TIAA / CREF进行了系统分析,使我们得出结论,与社会保障相关的福利具有比TIAA / CREF高得多的替代率。 1972年,《社会保障》为退休人员提供了通货膨胀证明福利,而私人计划的福利对价格变化非常敏感。私人计划为个人提供固定的收入来源,这很容易受到通货膨胀的影响。因此,近年来人们一直严重依赖社会保障福利。由于社会保障部门目前正面临严重的财务压力,因此提出了一些改善私人计划的福利结构的建议,以减轻其中的一些困难。;另一个重要的问题是任何人为退休储蓄年,尤其是那些高校等的雇员,是节省这些储蓄的风险。在过去的25年中,TIAA的回报非常适度,变化程度很小。与此相反,CREF的平均回报率很高,差异很大。问题是人们应该追求高回报还是低风险。当然,这取决于个人,是风险爱好者,风险中立者还是风险规避者。构建了一个理论模型来研究这个问题并提供最有效的投资组合。最后,在估算了TIAA和CREF的未来回报率之后,构建了一种效率度量,称为“替代率”,并用于评估绩效这些计划以及社会保障。本文的研究结果表明,社会保障局目前为个人提供的替代配给量要高于TIAA / CREF,其好处是可以证明通胀的事实表明,私人计划的未来取决于他们保护退休人员免受通胀影响的能力。社会保障体系最初旨在为个人提供退休福利底线,而不是收入替代,现在它在退休总收入中的地位比私人计划更为突出。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Clark University.;

  • 授予单位 Clark University.;
  • 学科 Finance.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1983
  • 页码 107 p.
  • 总页数 107
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号