首页> 外文学位 >REIFICATION AND HEGEMONY: THE POLITICS OF CULTURE IN THE WRITINGS OF GEORG LUKACS AND ANTONIO GRAMSCI, (1918-1938).
【24h】

REIFICATION AND HEGEMONY: THE POLITICS OF CULTURE IN THE WRITINGS OF GEORG LUKACS AND ANTONIO GRAMSCI, (1918-1938).

机译:宗教化和霸权:乔治·卢卡奇和安东尼奥·格拉姆西(1918-1938)的著作中的文化政治。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study is a comparison of the development of the theories of reification and hegemony in the writings and political activities of Georg Lukacs and Antonio Gramsci during the years from 1918 to 1938. In demonstrating that reification and hegemony were formulated in response to the unsuccessful revolutionary movements in Hungary and Italy of 1919-1920, it becomes evident that the respective theories of Lukacs and Gramsci were meant to constitute critiques of bourgeois cultural domination. Thus, their problematic extends to analyses of more specific issues, such as the role of positivist science as the prevailing "paradigm of rationality" and the instrumental function of "traditional" and "organic intellectuals." The solutions that both theorists sought in order to overcome reification and hegemony are embedded in their neo-Hegelian interpretations of Marxism, where historical materialism is defined as a methodology characterised by its utilisation of the conceptual tools of "dialectic," "totality," and "absolute historicism." However, Lukacs was forced by historical circumstances to retreat into the realm of aesthetics, although he continued the critique of reification by way of his theory of critical realism. Simultaneously, Gramsci began to elaborate more practical solutions to cultural domination through his theory of the "war of position," catharsis, and counter-hegemony.
机译:这项研究比较了乔治·卢卡奇(Georg Lukacs)和安东尼奥·葛兰西(Antonio Gramsci)在1918年至1938年间的著作和政治活动中的自尊和霸权理论的发展。这证明了自反和霸权是对革命运动失败的回应。在1919年至1920年的匈牙利和意大利,很明显卢卡奇和葛兰西各自的理论旨在构成对资产阶级文化统治的批判。因此,他们的问题扩展到对更具体问题的分析,例如实证主义科学作为普遍的“理性范式”的作用以及“传统”和“有机知识分子”的工具功能。两位理论家为克服具体化和霸权主义而寻求的解决方案都嵌入了他们对马克思主义的新黑格尔主义解释中,其中,历史唯物主义被定义为一种方法,其特征是利用了“辩证”,“全面”和“绝对历史主义。”然而,尽管卢卡奇通过批判现实主义的理论继续对唯物史观进行批判,但卢卡奇却因历史情况而不得不退缩到美学领域。同时,葛兰西开始通过他的“阵地战”,宣泄和反霸权理论,为文化统治制定更为实际的解决方案。

著录项

  • 作者

    ROBINSON, JAMES FRANKLIN.;

  • 作者单位

    McGill University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 McGill University (Canada).;
  • 学科 History European.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1983
  • 页码 1 p.
  • 总页数 1
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号