首页> 外文学位 >AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF PARTICIPATION IN A NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION HUMAN GENETICS AND BIOETHICAL DECISION-MAKING WORKSHOP ON BIOLOGY TEACHERS' IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECT SYNTHESIS GOALS.
【24h】

AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF PARTICIPATION IN A NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION HUMAN GENETICS AND BIOETHICAL DECISION-MAKING WORKSHOP ON BIOLOGY TEACHERS' IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECT SYNTHESIS GOALS.

机译:参与国家科学基金会人类遗传学和生物伦理决策研讨会对生物老师实施项目综合目标的影响评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study was designed to determine the relationship between participation in National Science Foundation (NSF) Pre-College Teacher Development (PTDS) Projects on Human Genetics and Bioethical Decision-Making held at Ball State University and classroom implementation of the Desired Biology Program described by Project Synthesis. NSF-PTDS Projects at Ball State University and Project Synthesis both focused on goals which emphasize human biology, biosocial concerns, and an understanding of the role that attitudes, values, and human needs exert in making decisions.;Teachers in both groups indicated they stressed the use of biological concepts to interpret human concerns. Groups differed in the amount of time allocated to human topics during the study of genetics. Although both groups of teachers devoted similar amounts of time to studying genetics, teachers in the criterion group tended to delete non-human topics and incorporate human topics to exemplify genetic principles.;Both groups appeared to recognize the importance of addressing biosocial problems and issues resulting from recent advances in genetics, and instructed students in ways to use biological knowledge to help make decisions. However, teachers in the criterion group integrated significantly more bioethics into their biology and life science programs.;Subjects in criterion and control groups primarily instructed students via lecture/discussion. Teachers in the criterion group made significantly greater use of outside speakers, films, videotapes, and television programs dealing with human genetics and bioethics.;The researcher employed an ex post facto criterion group design. Two groups of life science teachers, matched by gender, teaching experience, and location, were selected for study. The criterion group participated in NSF-PTDS Projects; the control group lacked NSF-PTDS Project experience. A questionnaire was constructed to collect data for testing eight null hypotheses. Questionnaires mailed to both criterion and control groups were designed to indicate the extent to which teachers implemented multifaceted instructional techniques, and goals directed toward human concerns, biosocial problems, and bioethical decision-making. The difference in percentage test was used to analyze categorical response items and three-way analysis of variance tested scaled response items.
机译:这项研究旨在确定参与国家科学基金会(NSF)在鲍尔州立大学举行的有关人类遗传学和生物伦理决策的大学预科教师发展(PTDS)项目与该项目描述的所需生物学计划的课堂实施之间的关系合成。鲍尔州立大学的NSF-PTDS项目和项目综合项目均侧重于目标,这些目标强调了人类生物学,生物社会问题以及对态度,价值观和人类需求在决策中所起的作用的理解。使用生物学概念来解释人类的担忧。在遗传学研究中,各组分配给人类主题的时间有所不同。尽管两组教师在学习遗传学上花费了相似的时间,但标准组中的教师倾向于删除非人类主题,并以人类主题为例来说明遗传原理。;两组似乎都认识到解决生物社会问题和由此产生的问题的重要性。从遗传学的最新进展,并指导学生如何使用生物学知识来帮助做出决定。但是,标准组的教师将更多的生物伦理学纳入了他们的生物学和生命科学课程。;标准组和对照组的对象主要通过讲课/讨论来指导学生。标准小组中的老师大量使用了涉及人类遗传学和生物伦理学的外部演讲者,电影,录像带和电视节目。研究人员采用事后标准小组设计。选择了两组生命科学教师,按性别,教学经验和地点相匹配进行研究。该标准小组参加了NSF-PTDS项目;对照组缺乏NSF-PTDS项目经验。构建了调查表以收集用于测试八个无效假设的数据。寄给标准组和对照组的问卷旨在表明教师实施多方面教学技术的程度,以及针对人类关注,生物社会问题和生物伦理决策的目标。百分比差异测试用于分析分类响应项目,并使用三项方差分析对比例响应项目进行了分析。

著录项

  • 作者

    WHILE, MARGARET LOUISE.;

  • 作者单位

    Ball State University.;

  • 授予单位 Ball State University.;
  • 学科 Education Sciences.
  • 学位 Educat.D.
  • 年度 1984
  • 页码 179 p.
  • 总页数 179
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号