首页> 外文学位 >THE CONCEPT OF THE CHINESE PEASANTRY IN THE WRITINGS OF KARL MARX AND MAO TSE-TUNG.
【24h】

THE CONCEPT OF THE CHINESE PEASANTRY IN THE WRITINGS OF KARL MARX AND MAO TSE-TUNG.

机译:马克思与毛泽东著作中中国农耕的观念。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Problem. My primary objective has been to examine the writings of Karl Marx and Mao Tse-tung in order to make a comparison on their concepts of the role of the Chinese peasantry.;Sources Used. Research from the works of Marx, Mao, and numerous secondary sources, both official and independent, have been used. To the best of my knowledge no publication or dissertation dealing specifically with the above noted questions is in existence.;Research Procedure. This study has been based on careful and methodical review and analysis of primary and secondary sources to produce an understanding of Marx and Mao in relation to their views to the peasantry.;Conclusion. Marx was greatly influenced by his nineteenth century urban European background. Mao was greatly influenced by his twentieth century rural Chinese background. But Mao was also influenced by Western ideas, especially those of Marx. He considered himself a Marxist.;I have attempted to clarify the following questions: (1) What was Karl Marx's view to the peasantry, and his perception of Asia in general, and what was his concept of the Asiatic mode of production? (2) What was Mao Tse-tung's view to the peasantry and how did it fit into his plans for the Chinese Revolution? (3) Did Mao's view on the peasantry conform with Marx's position or were adaptations and modifications severe enough to place Mao outside of Marx's tradition?;Marx's position on the peasantry was that it constituted a vacillating sector of the middle classes, an essentially reactionary class, but one which could occasionally be counted on in a temporary class alliance under proletarian leadership to fight for socialist revolution.;Mao's position on the peasantry was that they constituted the only practical means of winning a socialist revolution by virtue of their great numbers and their devotion to the proletarian line elucidated by the Communist Party of China.;I found Sinification of Marxism had occurred in Mao's position. The Chinese Revolution was only theoretically a proletarian led revolution, but in fact it was a peasant revolution. The conclusion which I drew was that Mao was not a Marxist, at least in his view to the peasantry.
机译:问题。我的主要目的是研究卡尔·马克思和毛泽东的著作,以便对他们对中国农民角色的概念进行比较。已经使用了马克思,毛泽东的著作以及众多官方和独立的二手资料进行的研究。就我所知,目前还没有专门针对上述问题的出版物或论文。这项研究基于对主要和次要来源的认真,系统的审查和分析,以使人们对马克思和毛泽东对农民的看法有所了解。马克思受他十九世纪欧洲城市背景的影响。毛泽东受到二十世纪中国农村背景的极大影响。但是毛泽东也受到西方思想的影响,尤其是马克思的思想。他认为自己是马克思主义者。我试图澄清以下问题:(1)卡尔·马克思对农民的看法是什么,他对亚洲的总体看法是什么,他对亚洲生产方式的看法是什么? (2)毛泽东对农民的看法是什么,如何适应他对中国革命的计划? (3)毛泽东关于农民的观点是否与马克思的立场相吻合或进行的修改和修改是否足以使毛泽东脱离马克思的传统?但是,在无产阶级领导下的临时阶级联盟中,有时可以指望这种联盟来争取社会主义革命。毛泽东对农民的立场是,凭借其庞大的人数和他们的力量,毛泽东是赢得社会主义革命的唯一实际手段。奉献给中国共产党阐明的无产阶级路线。我发现在毛泽东的立场上发生了马克思主义的中国化。从理论上讲,中国革命只是无产阶级领导的革命,但实际上它是一场农民革命。我得出的结论是,至少在毛农看来,毛泽东不是马克思主义者。

著录项

  • 作者

    SWACKER, ROBERT BRUCE.;

  • 作者单位

    New York University.;

  • 授予单位 New York University.;
  • 学科 Asian history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1984
  • 页码 220 p.
  • 总页数 220
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号