首页> 外文学位 >A critical examination of the Marxist theory of alienation (with special reference to the case of China) (Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Karl Marx, Mao Zedong).
【24h】

A critical examination of the Marxist theory of alienation (with special reference to the case of China) (Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Karl Marx, Mao Zedong).

机译:对马克思主义异化理论的批判性考察(特别针对中国的案例)(乔治·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔,卡尔·马克思,毛泽东)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I argue that, since Marx's theory of the cause of alienation is inadequate in accounting for all cases of alienation, his solution to overcoming alienation by abolishing private ownership and the capitalist mode of production is not tenable. The socialist society envisioned by Marx cannot overcome the alienation that he ascribed to the capitalist system and cannot avoid systematically producing its own form of alienation.; Marx was unable to discover any necessary causal link between alienation and "the movement of private property." Nevertheless, Marx's theory of socialism and communism is based on the assumption that private property is the cause of alienation and that the elimination of private property will eliminate alienation. Marx transformed Hegel's idea of alienation to fit a different context, wherein the solution to alienation was found in an examination of the material conditions of human existence rather than in an overall intellectual understanding of reality.; Even granted the truth of Marx's belief that the alienation of labor can be entirely eliminated by abolishing private ownership, it does not follow that the other forms of alienation in the realm of the superstructure will necessarily disappear with the transformation of the economic structure. The recognition of the fact that the source of alienation can be something other than private ownership is important to an understanding of the problems that have existed in the twentieth-century socialist societies.; My analyses of the political alienation caused by the effects of Mao's ideology and the economic alienation caused by the state's control of labor are intended to show the inadequacy of classical Marxist theory in accounting for the realities of not only Mao's regime but of all modern socialist regimes. The irrationality of central planning and the government's exploitation of labor are embedded in the fundamental structure of the socialism envisioned by Marx. These features inevitably become a prominent hindrance to the realization of socialist goals and eventually render these goals impossible.
机译:我认为,由于马克思关于异化原因的理论不足以解决所有异化问题,因此他通过废除私有制和资本主义生产方式来克服异化的解决办法是站不住脚的。马克思所设想的社会主义社会不能克服他归因于资本主义制度的异化,也不能避免系统地产生其自身的异化形式。马克思无法发现疏离与“私有财产的流动”之间任何必要的因果关系。但是,马克思的社会主义和共产主义理论是基于这样的假设,即私有财产是异化的原因,而消除私有财产将消除异化。马克思改变了黑格尔的疏远思想以适应不同的环境,其中疏远的解决办法是在对人类生存的物质条件的考察中而不是对现实的全面智力理解中找到的。即使承认马克思关于通过废除私有制可以完全消除劳动异化这一信念的事实,也不能得出随着经济结构的转变,上层建筑领域中其他形式的异化必然会消失的事实。认识到异化的源头可以是私有制以外的东西,这对于理解二十世纪社会主义社会中存在的问题很重要。我对由毛泽东思想的影响引起的政治疏远和由国家对劳动的控制所造成的经济疏远的分析旨在表明,古典马克思主义理论不足以解释毛泽东政权和所有现代社会主义政权的现实。 。中央计划的不合理性和政府对劳动的剥削被嵌入到马克思所设想的社会主义的基本结构中。这些特征不可避免地成为实现社会主义目标的主要障碍,并最终使这些目标成为不可能。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lu, Xiufen.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 216 p.
  • 总页数 216
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:47

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号