首页> 外文学位 >THE INTERFACE OF CUSTOMARY AND NATIONAL LAND LAW IN EAST KALIMANTAN, INDONESIA (DAYAK, LEGAL PLURALISM).
【24h】

THE INTERFACE OF CUSTOMARY AND NATIONAL LAND LAW IN EAST KALIMANTAN, INDONESIA (DAYAK, LEGAL PLURALISM).

机译:印度尼西亚东加里曼丹的习惯法与国家土地法的交界(达雅克,法律上的多元主义)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation incorporates methods from cultural anthropology and the anthropology of law to analyze the interface of customary and national land law in a Dayak village in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. It is shown that arriving at legal principles, derived from concrete cases isolated by using Pospisil's cross-culturally valid definition of law, is the first step in illuminating legal sensibilities. The imminglement of legal sensibilities, a phrase used by Geertz to characterize legal pluralism, can best be understood when the multiplicity of legal systems and the nature of legal levels within a society are used as the framework for discussion.;The Indonesian government's policy of granting concessions to timber companies and allocating land for development projects ignores the Dayaks' right to land. Under Dayak customary law, individuals have the right to plant trees on their land, to lend or give it to a co-villager, to farm it at their discretion, and to dispose of it in a testamentary transaction. Provisions in the Basic Agrarian Law of Indonesia stating that agrarian law is based on customary law do not, according to interpretations by government officials in East Kalimantan, apply to the customary law of shifting cultivators such as the Dayaks. Scholars of Indonesian law have obscured the rights of the individual to land by emphasizing the village right of disposal, confusing political and economic rights to land.;Legal cases collected during fifteen months of fieldwork in Dayak villages in East Kalimantan illuminate Dayak land tenure and the critical role of the headman in the adat (customary law) process of reaching a consensus through directed discussion. The headman, who is the consensus maker within the village, attempted to have a national government representative, the sub-district official, act as the consensus maker between the villagers and government officials, thus illustrating how power shifts between legal levels.
机译:本文结合文化人类学和法律人类学的方法,分析了印度尼西亚东加里曼丹省Dayak村的习惯法和国家土地法之间的关系。结果表明,得出法律原则是从阐明使用Pospisil的跨文化有效法律定义所孤立的具体案例中得出的,是阐明法律敏感性的第一步。当将法律体系的多样性和社会内部法律水平的性质用作讨论的框架时,可以最好地理解法律敏感性的增强,这是盖尔茨用来描述法律多元化的特征。对木材公司的优惠和为发展项目分配土地,无视达亚克人的土地权。根据达雅克习惯法,个人有权在自己的土地上植树,出借或赠予同居者,酌情耕种并在遗嘱交易中处置。根据东加里曼丹省政府官员的解释,印度尼西亚《基本农业法》中有关农业法以习惯法为基础的规定不适用于像达雅克这样的耕种者的习惯法。印度尼西亚法律学者强调村庄的处置权,混淆了土地的政治和经济权利,从而掩盖了个人的土地权。在东加里曼丹省达雅克村进行的15个月田野调查中收集到的法律案件阐明了达雅克的土地使用权和负责人在通过直接讨论达成共识的adat(习惯法)过程中的关键作用。村长是村里的共识制定者,他试图让一位国民政府代表,街道官员充当村民和政府官员之间的共识制定者,从而说明了权力如何在法律层面之间转移。

著录项

  • 作者

    VARGAS, DONNA MAYO.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Anthropology Cultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 282 p.
  • 总页数 282
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号