首页> 外文学位 >A COMPARISON OF ACHIEVEMENT OF STUDENTS USING STUDENT GENERATED NOTES VS. TEACHER GENERATED NOTES.
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF ACHIEVEMENT OF STUDENTS USING STUDENT GENERATED NOTES VS. TEACHER GENERATED NOTES.

机译:使用学生生成的笔记与学生取得成绩的比较。教师生成的笔记。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine the difference in achievement of students who generate their own notes and students who are provided with teacher assisted notes.; The investigation of the problem was stated as a single null hypothesis: There is no significant difference between the achievement of the student generated note taking group and the teacher provided or assisted note taking group.; The researcher selected four teachers, each teaching two sections of the same class. Each instructor prepared a teaching segment and prepared and administered a pretest and posttest on the subject matter. For one group, they prepared notes and the other, they instructed to make their own notes.; Classroom Environment 1 was taken from a seventh grade social studies class. The teaching segment covered a unit on earth movement.; Classroom Environment 2 was taken from a ninth grade literature class. The teaching segment covered a unit on reading and study skills.; Classroom Environment 3 was taken from a tenth grade communications class. The teaching segment covered a unit on verbals.; Classroom Environment 4 was taken from a graphic language class at Arizona State University. The teaching segment covered a unit on dimensioning.; The means of the pretest were covaried on the means of the posttest for each classroom environment, using the BMDP1V program for one way analysis of variance and covariance. This program was developed by the Department of Biomathematics at the University of California, Los Angeles, California. This analysis adjusts the posttest means based on initial differences determined by the pretest. The .05 level of significant difference was used in this study.; All four classroom environments were found to have higher adjusted posttest means. These means, however, were not found to be significant at the .05 level of significance.
机译:这项研究的目的是研究产生自己的笔记的学生和获得教师辅助笔记的学生在成绩上的差异。对问题的调查被陈述为单一的无效假设:学生生成的笔记组与老师提供或协助的笔记组之间的成绩没有显着差异。研究人员选择了四位老师,每位老师教同一堂课的两个部分。每位讲师准备了一个教学环节,并准备并进行了主题的预测和后测。对于一组,他们准备了笔记,而另一组,他们指示自己做笔记。课堂环境1来自七年级社会研究课。教学部分包括一个关于地球运动的单元。课堂环境2来自九年级的文学课。教学部分包括阅读和学习技能单元。课堂环境3取自十年级的通讯班。教学部分涵盖了语言单元。课堂环境4取自亚利桑那州立大学的图形语言课。教学部分涵盖了尺寸标注单元。使用BMDP1V程序对方差和协方差进行单向分析,针对每种教室环境,对前测的均值与后测的均值进行协方差。该程序由加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校的生物数学系开发。该分析根据预测试确定的初始差异来调整后测试均值。本研究使用.05显着差异水平。发现所有四个教室环境的调整后测验均值较高。但是,在0.05的显着性水平上,这些均值并不显着。

著录项

  • 作者

    TOPPEN, JAMES LEE.;

  • 作者单位

    Arizona State University.;

  • 授予单位 Arizona State University.;
  • 学科 Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 94 p.
  • 总页数 94
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:06

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号