首页> 外文学位 >THE FRUEHROMANTIK AS A CRITICAL IMITATION OF THE LATE MEDIEVAL ROMANCE (JENA CIRCLE, NOVALIS, LUDWIG TIECK, FRIEDRICH SCHLEGEL).
【24h】

THE FRUEHROMANTIK AS A CRITICAL IMITATION OF THE LATE MEDIEVAL ROMANCE (JENA CIRCLE, NOVALIS, LUDWIG TIECK, FRIEDRICH SCHLEGEL).

机译:FRUEHROMANTIK是中世纪晚期浪漫主义(JENA圆,Novalis,Ludwig TIECK,FRIEDRICH SCHLEGEL)的重要模仿。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study reexamines the medieval studies of the Erohcomantikec (Tieck, Novalis, the Schlegels, and Wackenroder) arguing that their medieval scholarship was so influential in shaping Jena Circle aes-thetic theory and fiction that much of their work constitutes a "critical imitation" of the conventions and values of late medieval and early renaissance literature. My analysis rests on the possibility that a critic and poet can glean not only conventions, but the plausible theory behind those conventions from reading, not a critical essay, but a work of fiction, and that the critic and poet's own aesthetic theory may also find clear expression in his works of fiction.; Chapter 1 examines past scholarship of Jena Circle medieval studies as a product of "generative entrenchment," a Zeitgeist bias, faulty and often too philosophical definitions of key Jena Circle terms, and a failure to recognize that there are multifarious interpretations of medieval literature.; Chapter 2 illustrates the extent of the Circle's involvement with late medieval literature and the scholarly methodology and conclu-sions they, ironically, share with the reigning American and English medievalists of the 1960's: D. W. Robertson, Bloomfield, Muscatine, and Brewer. No lineage from Novalis to Princeton is suggested; the point is that those who dismiss Jena Circle conclusions about medieval literature as "incorrect" are also dismissing preface to Chaucer.; Chapter 3 starts from Lovejoy's premise that "romantisch" stems from the romance, not the novel, the Gothic novel, or the Marchen, then illuminates medieval genre theory as a key to Jena Circle genre discussions. Chapters 4 and 5 then set up eleven features--both con-ventions and underlying values--of late medieval and early renais-sance romances which the Jena Circle both praises as "romantisch" and imitates in its own fiction. Jena Circle "symbols" are shown to often be standard late medieval iconography, its idealism and view of history to be the underlying values of late medieval romances. The final chapter suggests the inherent form-content relationship in the romance which facilitated the critical imitation.
机译:这项研究重新审视了伊罗科曼狄克(Erohcomantikec)的中世纪研究(Tieck,Novalis,Schlegels和Wackenroder),认为他们的中世纪学者在塑造耶拿·圈子美学理论和小说方面如此有影响力,以致于他们的许多作品构成了对“耶拿·圈子”美学理论的“批判模仿”中世纪晚期和文艺复兴早期文学的惯例和价值。我的分析基于这样一种可能性,即批评家和诗人不仅可以搜集习俗,而且可以从阅读中获得这些习俗背后的合理理论,而不是批判性论文,而是小说作品,并且批评家和诗人自己的美学理论也可能会发现在他的小说作品中表达清楚。第1章考察了耶拿圈子中世纪研究的过去学术成果,这是“生成性的根深蒂固”的产物,它是时代精神的偏见,关键耶拿圈子术语的错误定义,而且常常是过于哲学性的定义,并且未能认识到中世纪文学有多种解释。第2章说明了Circle参与晚期中世纪文学的程度,以及具有讽刺意味的是,它们与1960年代在位的美国和英国中世纪主义者共享了学术方法和结论:D。W. Robertson,Bloomfield,Muscatine和Brewer。没有建议从诺瓦利斯到普林斯顿的血统。关键是那些认为耶拿·希尔德关于中世纪文学的结论是“不正确的”的人也否认了乔uc的序言。第三章从洛夫乔伊的前提出发,即“浪漫主义”源于浪漫史,而不是小说,哥特式小说或马尔琴小说,然后阐明了中世纪流派理论,将其作为耶拿圈子流派讨论的关键。然后,第4章和第5章建立了中世纪晚期和早期复兴浪漫史的11个特征(既有公约又有潜在价值),耶拿圈子既赞扬“浪漫主义”,又在自己的小说中加以模仿。耶拿圈子的“符号”通常被视为中世纪后期的标准肖像画,其理想主义和历史观是中世纪后期浪漫史的基本价值。最后一章提出了浪漫史中固有的形式-内容关系,这种关系促进了批判模仿。

著录项

  • 作者

    GOEBEL, JANET ELAINE.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.; Literature Germanic.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1986
  • 页码 364 p.
  • 总页数 364
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 文学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号