首页> 外文学位 >Is Japanese management culturally-specific: An examination of employee/employer values of Japanese and American banks in California.
【24h】

Is Japanese management culturally-specific: An examination of employee/employer values of Japanese and American banks in California.

机译:日本管理层在文化上是否特定:对加利福尼亚州日本和美国银行的员工/雇主价值进行检查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Many Americans believe that Japanese management practices are culturally-specific and unsuitable for implementation in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine whether Japanese management practices and organizational values clash with American values. The introduction outlines human resource policies practiced by Japanese firms in Japan and postulates reasons for failures of Japanese techniques in American corporations.; Nonmanagement employees (n = 326) of Japanese- and American-owned banks in California were used for the study. Congruency between corporate and personal values were assessed with a self-constructed values questionnaire based upon England's Personal Values Questionnaire (1967). Human resource management techniques, organizational commitment, and job involvement were also assessed.; The results indicate that Japanese managers don't use management practices common in Japan because of their concern that such practices won't work with an American workforce. However, American employees of both banks expressed interest in incorporating Japanese techniques in their organization. Employees of Japanese-owned banks feel that their current job security policy is much better than those of previous banks in which they worked. In addition, American-owned banks have more extensive training programs and use participation in decision-making more than their Japanese counterparts.; The centralized decision-making policies of Japanese-owned banks appear to be caused by cultural confusion and a resultant lack of trust between parent company nationals and American employees. This, in turn, has created a rigid corporate culture where lines of authority are clear. Conformity and obedience were among the most prominent corporate values for Japanese-owned banks whereas personal initiative and ambition were valued in American-owned banks. No overall differences were found between the banks in employee acceptance of corporate values. Finally, no differences were found between Japanese- and American-owned banks in organizational commitment and job involvement.
机译:许多美国人认为,日本的管理惯例具有特定的文化背景,不适合在美国实施。这项研究的目的是确定日本的管理实践和组织价值观是否与美国价值观发生冲突。引言概述了日本公司在日本实施的人力资源政策,并提出了日本技术在美国公司中失败的原因。该研究使用了加利福尼亚的日资和美资银行的非管理人员(n = 326)。公司和个人价值观之间的一致性是根据英格兰的《个人价值观调查表》(1967年)通过自我构造的价值观调查表进行评估的。还评估了人力资源管理技术,组织承诺和工作参与。结果表明,日本经理不使用日本常见的管理惯例,因为他们担心这种惯例不适用于美国劳动力。但是,两家银行的美国雇员都表示有兴趣将日本的技术纳入其组织。日资银行的员工认为,他们目前的工作保障政策要比以前工作过的银行要好得多。此外,与日本的银行相比,美国的银行拥有更广泛的培训计划,并更多地参与决策。日本国有银行的中央决策政策似乎是由于文化混乱以及由此导致的母公司国民与美国雇员之间缺乏信任造成的。反过来,这创造了一种僵化的企业文化,其中权限界限清晰。遵从性和服从性是日资银行最重要的企业价值之一,而个人主动性和野心在美资银行中最为重要。银行之间在员工接受公司价值方面没有发现总体差异。最后,日资和美资银行之间在组织承诺和工作参与方面没有差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hall, Bradley William.;

  • 作者单位

    Tulane University.;

  • 授予单位 Tulane University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.; Psychology Industrial.; Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1989
  • 页码 153 p.
  • 总页数 153
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;工业心理学;社会学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号