首页> 外文学位 >After the recovery: Understanding education policy shifts in Rwanda, 1998--2012.
【24h】

After the recovery: Understanding education policy shifts in Rwanda, 1998--2012.

机译:复苏后:了解卢旺达教育政策的变化,1998--2012年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This is a qualitative case study of post-conflict Rwandan education policy development. It analyzes the Rwandan education policy subsystem over a 14 year period, with particular attention given to the dynamics between Rwandan state actors and donors in the education sector, and on tracking the flow of policy ideas and discourse as it flows from external reference societies to the Rwandan education sector. The analysis focuses on the period following Rwanda's recovery from 1994 genocide, beginning in 1998 with the launch of a process that was to culminate in the adoption of the first post-conflict education policy, and ending in 2012.;The study provides insights into belief systems of the coalitions driving education policy shifts in Rwanda and how those belief systems intersected with each other. This case study contributes to the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), a theory of policy change, by describing an understudied case; redefining the gap in ACF case studies as categorical (lacking in civil society) rather than geographical (lacking in African cases); and proposing to redefine ACF variables to mitigate a bias towards pluralist democracies. It also contributes to a rising research agenda within literature on education and fragility by describing a case with common post-conflict variables (a steadily strengthening state; a ruling party composed mostly of a minority ethnic group; ongoing conflict at state borders) so that future meta-analyses can identify common patterns and characteristics of educational policy development among comparable cases. Finally, this study contributes specifically to an understanding of the politics of Rwandan educational development by describing meso-level policy making during the post-recovery period, whereas previous literature focused on the recovery period, macro-level analyses of donor-state relations, and micro-level policy analyses. It highlights how education policies, such as basic education policy, can be aligned discursively and with donor dollars, while simultaneously advancing local agendas through public expenditure on education.
机译:这是冲突后卢旺达教育政策发展的定性案例研究。它分析了卢旺达教育政策子系统历时14年,其中特别关注了卢旺达国家行为者与教育部门捐助者之间的动态,并跟踪了从外部参照社团流向社会的政策思想和话语流。卢旺达教育部门。分析的重点是卢旺达从1994年种族灭绝中恢复后的时期,始于1998年,该过程的启动最终采用了第一个冲突后教育政策,并于2012年结束。该研究提供了对信仰的见解。卢旺达推动教育政策转变的联盟体系以及这些信仰体系如何相互交织。本案例研究通过描述一个未充分研究的案例,为政策变革理论“倡导联盟框架”(ACF)做出了贡献;将ACF案例研究中的差距重新定义为分类(民间社会中没有)而不是地理(非洲案例中没有);提议重新定义ACF变量,以减轻对多元化民主国家的偏见。它通过描述一个具有共同冲突后变量的案例(一个稳步加强的国家;一个由少数族裔组成的执政党;在州边界不断发生的冲突),也为教育和脆弱性文献中不断上升的研究议程做出了贡献荟萃分析可以确定可比案例中教育政策制定的共同模式和特征。最后,本研究通过描述恢复后时期的中观政策制定,特别有助于加深对卢旺达教育发展的政治理解,而先前的文献则侧重于恢复时期,对捐助国关系的宏观分析以及微观政策分析。它着重强调了如何在基础上与捐赠者的话语相适应地调整教育政策,例如基础教育政策,同时通过公共教育支出推进地方议程。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ehrenberg, Steven.;

  • 作者单位

    Teachers College, Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Teachers College, Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Education policy.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 181 p.
  • 总页数 181
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号