首页> 外文学位 >Learning effects and the pace of technological change: The case of the midwestern farm implement industry, 1850-1890
【24h】

Learning effects and the pace of technological change: The case of the midwestern farm implement industry, 1850-1890

机译:学习效果和技术变革的步伐:中西部农具行业案例,1850-1890年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Economic historians seem well-equipped to understand the consequences of technological change. They are less able, however, to explain the sources of invention and the evolution of new techniques.;Accordingly, this dissertation makes use of over 4,000 patents in identifying the institutional environment that stimulated the growth of technological change in the midwestern farm implement industry from 1850 through 1890. It argues that the evolution of products and firms that typified the industry stimulated the growth of learning effects which, in turn, led to a rising pace and volume of invention.;Chapter One identifies three distinct forms of learning effects: learning by doing, learning through others, and learning through use and sales. The content, and relative importance, of these learning effects evolved over three stages: (I) Firm and Product Creation, 1850-60; (II) Firm and Product Enhancement, 1860-70; and (III) Firm and Product Maturation, 1870-90.;Subsequent chapters delineate the changes in learning and invention that demarcate each stage. Within these stages the forms of learning complemented one another, imparting a dynamic quality to technological change.;Chapter Two links the genesis of learning effects to the creation of firms and products within the implement industry. These nascent firms and products embodied the knowledge and skills that fostered technological change. Hence, patented inventions accumulated as learning transpired, primarily at the site of production.;Chapter Three demonstrates that as the industry expanded and products were refined, inventive abilities were diffused as existing firms grew and as others were created. These newer firms emerged in close geographic proximity to entrenched establishments. Thus, a pattern of "localized learning" burgeoned as interpersonal communication and labor mobility grew in particular counties. Such counties tended to sustain themselves as "pockets of invention".;After 1870, firms organized and integrated their efforts to acquire technological knowledge and useable patents. These efforts, detailed in Chapter Four, proved remarkably successful. Implement producers obtained dozens of inventions via the assignment or licensing of patents, and by hiring laborers who had become professional inventors. As a result, a market for technology emerged within the industry.;This market was, itself, largely localized. Indeed, across the three stages, learning and invention were symbiotically linked to the economic geography of firm and product development.
机译:经济史学家似乎有足够的能力来理解技术变革的后果。然而,他们却无法解释发明的来源和新技术的发展。因此,本论文利用了4,000多项专利来确定刺激中西部农具行业技术变革增长的制度环境。从1850年到1890年。它认为代表行业的产品和公司的发展刺激了学习效果的增长,进而导致发明的步伐和数量的增加。;第一章确定了三种不同形式的学习效果:学习通过做事,通过他人学习以及通过使用和销售来学习。这些学习效果的内容和相对重要性分三个阶段发展:(I)企业和产品创造,1850-60; (II)企业和产品增强,1860-170; (III)公司和产品的成熟度,1870-90年。在这些阶段中,学习的形式相互补充,为技术变革赋予了动态的质量。第二章将学习效果的起源与工具行业中企业和产品的创造联系起来。这些新生的公司和产品体现了促进技术变革的知识和技能。因此,随着学习的积累,主要是在生产现场积累了专利发明。第三章表明,随着行业的发展和产品的细化,发明能力随着现有公司的成长和创建而散播。这些较新的公司在地理上与根深蒂固的机构非常接近。因此,在特定的县中,随着人际交往和劳动力流动的兴起,“本地化学习”模式迅速发展。这些县倾向于维持自己的“发明口袋”。1870年以后,公司组织并整合了他们的努力,以获取技术知识和可用专利。第四章详细介绍了这些工作,并取得了巨大的成功。机具生产者通过转让或许可专利以及雇用已成为专业发明家的劳动者获得了数十项发明。结果,该行业出现了技术市场。该市场本身基本上是本地化的。实际上,在这三个阶段中,学习和发明与公司和产品开发的经济地理学共生关联。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nader, John Samuel.;

  • 作者单位

    New School for Social Research.;

  • 授予单位 New School for Social Research.;
  • 学科 Economic history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1991
  • 页码 220 p.
  • 总页数 220
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号