首页> 外文学位 >What helps weak writers learn to write better? A pilot study in the Harvard Expository Writing Program.
【24h】

What helps weak writers learn to write better? A pilot study in the Harvard Expository Writing Program.

机译:什么能帮助弱小的作家学会写得更好?哈佛讲解写作计划的初步研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis investigates how weak writers fare in non-remedial expository writing classes and identifies how two common obstacles to writing improvement can be overcome. It focuses on activities that help students improve their writing and points to the importance of effective communication between students and teachers.;The students whose writing improved most were distinguished from those whose writing improved least by how they worked with their teachers. The students who improved least were hindered by two common obstacles to writing improvement: misunderstanding teachers' written and verbal comments about an essay and a lack of strategies for revising an essay. Students misunderstood teachers' comments in three ways: they didn't understand specific terms teachers used; their expectations about what their essays should accomplish differed from their teachers' expectations; and they misunderstood how their teachers wanted them to use the written comments. Even when students and teachers had a congruent understanding of the teacher's written comments, many students were unable to improve their essays because they lacked strategies for making the necessary revisions.;Only students whose writing improved most overcame both obstacles to writing improvement. To remedy misunderstandings about teachers' feedback, these students, or their teachers, initiated a dialogue in order to establish congruent views about the weaknesses in students' essays and the necessary revisions. To overcome the students' inability to make the necessary revisions, the teachers devised concrete, specific revision strategies, which the students used effectively.;This thesis recommends techniques for overcoming both types of obstacles, based on the actions of these students and their teachers.;For these purposes, forty-four first-year Harvard students and nineteen Expository Writing teachers were interviewed during the Fall semester of 1990. Students and teachers were asked about students' writing weaknesses and any activities that helped students improve their essays. A writing test was administered before and after students took an Expository Writing course to measure how, and how much, their writing improved. A mixture of qualitative and quantitative methods were used to identify students whose writing improved most and students whose writing improved least.
机译:本文研究了弱者在非补救性说明文写作班中的表现如何,并指出了如何克服写作改进的两个常见障碍。它着重于帮助学生提高写作水平的活动,并指出了师生之间有效交流的重要性。通过与老师的合作,使写作水平提高最大的学生与学习水平最小的学生区分开。进步最快的学生受到写作改进的两个常见障碍:误解教师对论文的书面和口头评论,以及缺乏修改论文的策略。学生通过三种方式误解了教师的评论:他们不理解教师使用的特定术语;他们对自己的论文应达到的期望与教师的期望不同;他们误解了他们的老师希望他们如何使用书面评论。即使学生和老师对老师的书面评论有一致的理解,许多学生仍无法改善自己的论文,因为他们缺乏进行必要修订的策略。只有写作水平提高最多的学生才能克服写作障碍。为了纠正对教师反馈的误解,这些学生或其老师发起了对话,以就学生论文的弱点和必要的修订建立一致的看法。为了克服学生无法进行必要的修订的过程,老师们设计了具体的,具体的修订策略,使学生有效地运用了这些策略。本论文根据这些学生及其老师的行为,提出了克服两种障碍的技巧。出于这些目的,在1990年秋季学期对44名哈佛大学一年级学生和19名讲故事写作老师进行了采访。询问学生和老师关于学生写作方面的弱点以及任何有助于学生改善论文的活动。在学生参加说明性写作课程之前和之后都进行了写作测试,以衡量他们的写作水平以及提高的程度。定性和定量方法的混合被用来识别写作改善最大的学生和写作改善最小的学生。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bushey, Barbara Carol.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.;Education Language and Literature.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 1991
  • 页码 243 p.
  • 总页数 243
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:50:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号