首页> 外文学位 >An open or closed technology policy? India's regulation of technology licenses, foreign direct investment, and intellectual property.
【24h】

An open or closed technology policy? India's regulation of technology licenses, foreign direct investment, and intellectual property.

机译:开放还是封闭的技术政策?印度对技术许可,外国直接投资和知识产权的规定。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The government of India has pursued its goal of technological self-reliance by limiting the access of Indian firms to foreign technology, the hope being that Indian firms would respond by performing more research and development (R&D) on their own. The three measures employed by the Indian government were: (1) the adoption of a relatively weak patent regime, (2) the limitation of foreign direct investment (FDI), and (3) the regulation of foreign technology purchase (TP) licenses. This thesis examines the impacts of these policies using firm-level data from the 1975-1983 period.; First, the effects of India's technology policies on R&D are examined in a two-equation system in which both R&D and TP are endogenous variables. The prevalence of corner solutions for R&D and TP necessitates maximum-likelihood estimation of the system, and the panel nature of the data requires that firm-level heterogeneity be addressed through numerical integration techniques. The results indicate that R&D and TP are substitutes for one another, implying that the regulations on technology purchase licenses did stimulate domestic R&D. The estimates also indicate that the overall effect of FDI is to raise R&D, suggesting that India's limitation of FDI reduced R&D. Finally, both domestic and international R&D spillovers have a positive impact on R&D, perhaps implying that India's weak patent protection for foreigners stimulated domestic R&D.; Next, the thesis provides production function estimates which indicate that the private returns to TP far exceed the returns to R&D, implying that the regulations on foreign technology licenses were very costly from a private point of view. These results also confirm the importance of international and domestic spillovers in the production of knowledge.; Using the factor choice and production function estimates, policy simulations are conducted which quantify the effects of changing government policies on the levels of R&D TP, output, and profits. The simulations suggest that due to corner solutions there is little leverage for the closed technology policy to stimulate domestic R&D and that the costs of such policies are quite high.
机译:印度政府通过限制印度公司获得外国技术来实现其技术自力更生的目标,希望印度公司能够通过自己进行更多的研发来做出回应。印度政府采用的三项措施是:(1)采用相对薄弱的专利制度;(2)限制外国直接投资(FDI);以及(3)外国技术购买(TP)许可证的监管。本文使用1975年至1983年的企业级数据检验了这些政策的影响。首先,在两方程系统中研究了印度技术政策对R&D的影响,其中R&D和TP都是内生变量。 R&D和TP的角点解决方案的盛行需要对系统进行最大似然估计,而数据的面板性质要求通过数值积分技术解决公司层面的异质性。结果表明,R&D和TP是彼此替代的,这意味着技术购买许可证的规定确实刺激了国内R&D。估计数还表明,外国直接投资的总体效果是提高研发,这表明印度对外国直接投资的限制降低了研发。最后,国内外研发溢出对研发都有积极影响,这可能意味着印度对外国人的专利保护薄弱刺激了国内研发。接下来,本文提供了生产函数估计值,这些估计值表明私人对TP的回报远远超过了R&D的回报,这意味着从私人的角度来看,外国技术许可的法规成本很高。这些结果也证实了国际和国内溢出对知识生产的重要性。利用因子选择和生产函数估计,进行政策模拟,以量化政府政策变化对研发目标,产出和利润水平的影响。模拟表明,由于采用了边角解决方案,封闭技术政策几乎没有刺激国内研发的杠杆作用,而且这种政策的成本很高。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fikkert, Brian Todd.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Economics General.; Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1994
  • 页码 288 p.
  • 总页数 288
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济学;政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号