首页> 外文学位 >Good families/good citizens: The anxiety of re-imagining the domestic sphere.
【24h】

Good families/good citizens: The anxiety of re-imagining the domestic sphere.

机译:好家庭/好公民:重新构想家庭领域的焦虑。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines the United States Supreme Court's treatment of the family over the last three decades, when the Court began expansively interpreting the Constitution to extend rights of privacy and autonomy to the family and its individual members. The state has traditionally regulated the family's form and functions to assure that the family would complement the structure of relationships in the public realm by absorbing the costs of dependency and properly socializing its members as citizens political understandings of citizenship, autonomy and dependency are deeply imbricated in the family. Recognizing family and individual rights to privacy has raised two questions of considerable political importance: how should the costs of dependency be allocated between the public and the domestic spheres, and what kind of citizen is the state entitled to seek to reproduce? Attempts to answer those questions taps into deep-seated anxieties whether the family can continue to assume its traditional functions, and, more broadly, about those basic social structures that impose order in a civil society, and that mediate the relationship between the individual and the state.To date, scholarship on the family has paid insufficient attention to the independent interest of the state in regulating the family. How concerns about dependency and socialization are intertwined, and how constitutional concepts, particularly rights of privacy, are used to mediate those concerns, are discussed. Finally, the study asks whether the state can or ought to promote a normative vision of the family, given the traditional precepts of a liberal polity that militate against articulating such a vision.In some cases, the Court has expansively interpreted rights of privacy and equality for individuals in others, the Court has appeared to try to hold the family together in its traditional form, recasting those same rights in ways that recapture the privileged position of the procreative family and maintain traditional allocations of power within the family.
机译:这项研究考察了美国最高法院在过去的三十年中对家庭的待遇,当时该法院开始广泛地解释《宪法》,以将隐私权和自治权扩展到家庭及其个人成员。国家传统上规范家庭的形式和功能,以确保家庭通过吸收依赖性的成本并适当地使其成员社会化来补充公共领域的关系结构,因为公民对公民权,自治权和依赖性的政治理解已深深扎根于此。家庭。承认家庭和个人的隐私权提出了两个具有重大政治意义的问题:抚养费用应如何在公共领域和家庭领域之间分配,国家有权寻求再生产的公民是哪种?试图回答这些问题的根源在于,家庭是否能够继续承担其传统职能,以及更广泛地说,是那些构成公民社会秩序的,能够调解个人与社会之间关系的基本社会结构,引起了人们的焦虑。迄今为止,有关家庭的奖学金并未充分关注国家在调节家庭方面的独立利益。讨论了有关依赖性和社会化的问题如何交织在一起,以及如何使用宪法概念(尤其是隐私权)来调解这些问题。最后,该研究询问,鉴于自由主义政体的传统规定不利于阐明这种愿景,国家是否应该或应该促进家庭的规范愿景。在某些情况下,法院对隐私权和平等权作了广泛的解释对于他人而言,法院似乎试图以传统形式将家庭团结在一起,以重新夺回同样权利的方式重获生殖性家庭的特权,并维持家庭内部传统的权力分配。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hearst, Alice Louise.;

  • 作者单位

    Cornell University.;

  • 授予单位 Cornell University.;
  • 学科 Law.Sociology Individual and Family Studies.Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 190 p.
  • 总页数 190
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号