首页> 外文学位 >Hobbes and the Enlightenment rejection of military virtue.
【24h】

Hobbes and the Enlightenment rejection of military virtue.

机译:霍布斯和启蒙运动拒绝军事美德。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Hobbes attempts to remove civil conflict through the creation of a state authority so powerful that no one will resist it. This study defends and develops the position of Leo Strauss that Hobbes uses fear of violent death the antidote for that he considers anti-social qualities. In the process Hobbes cultivates an anti-heroic morality. Those who are afraid to die will cooperate with the sovereign, but those who are not afraid to die become variables who cannot be accounted for in the Hobbesian system. The "virtues" are so-called not because they make a man morally good, but only insofar as they contribute to peace and comfort. Honor, loyalty, refusal to compromise and courage to suffer or die for one's beliefs cease to be virtues. Hobbes' theory leads to cowardice, compromise, complaisance and self-indulgence as being more appropriate civic virtues. Thus Hobbes strives to reduce everyone to the least common denominator, in which any claim to moral excellence is held to be destructive of the peace.; This study contrasts Hobbesian thought with traditional philosophers to show how Hobbes viewed the basic history of thought on heroism and military virtue, and how he misinterprets or oversimplifies this tradition.; Loyalty is quite openly rejected as Hobbes insists that obligation to a leader ends with his ability to protect his followers. While Hobbes continues to speak of honor as an important concept, honor is nothing more than good reputation which is used to increase one's standing. Hobbes is explicit in denying courage and discipline the status of virtues. Courage is a kind of anger which can be useful individuals but is usually harmful to the community. Hobbes cultivates a sense of anti-heroism by filling his writings with suggestions that weakness and fear are not blameworthy--and he uses his own life as an ideal of the timorous citizen.; The new morality rejecting courage, honor, loyalty and refusal to compromise was adopted and deepened by Hobbes' intellectual heirs. Such concepts as the emphasis on compassion and human dignity find their seeds in Hobbes and contribute to the rejection of military virtues in new ways.
机译:霍布斯试图通过建立一个如此强大的国家权威以消除任何人的内战,以至于没人能抗拒它。这项研究捍卫并发展了霍布斯(Leo Strauss)的观点,即霍布斯(Hobbes)使用对暴力死亡的恐惧作为他认为具有反社会特质的解药。在这一过程中,霍布斯培养了反英雄的道德。那些怕死的人会与君主合作,但是那些不怕死的人会成为无法在霍布斯主义体系中解释的变数。所谓“美德”不是因为它们使人在道德上变得良好,而仅仅是在它们有助于和平与舒适的范围内。荣誉,忠诚,拒绝妥协以及为自己的信仰而遭受苦难或死亡的勇气不再是美德。霍布斯的理论导致怯ward,妥协,自满和自我放纵,这是更恰当的公民美德。因此,霍布斯努力使每个人都成为最不常见的分母,在该分母中,任何追求道德卓越的主张都被认为破坏了和平。这项研究将霍布斯的思想与传统哲学家进行了对比,以表明霍布斯如何看待关于英雄主义和军事美德的基本思想史,以及他如何误解或简化了这一传统。忠诚被公开拒绝,因为霍布斯坚称,领导者的义务以保护自己的追随者的能力而告终。尽管霍布斯继续将荣誉作为一个重要概念,但荣誉不过是用来提高个人地位的良好声誉。霍布斯明确拒绝勇气和约束美德的地位。勇气是一种愤怒,可以使个人受益,但通常对社区有害。霍布斯通过在他的著作中充斥一些建议,认为软弱和恐惧不是罪魁祸首,从而培养了一种反英雄主义的意识,并且他将自己的生活作为有教养的公民的理想。拒绝勇气,荣誉,忠诚和拒绝妥协的新道德被霍布斯的知识分子继承者接受并深化了。强调同情心和人的尊严之类的概念在霍布斯找到了种子,并以新的方式有助于拒绝军事美德。

著录项

  • 作者

    Clark, Paul Alexander.;

  • 作者单位

    The Catholic University of America.;

  • 授予单位 The Catholic University of America.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.; History General.; Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 303 p.
  • 总页数 303
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;世界史;政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号