首页> 外文学位 >A defense of Aristotle's doctrine of the unity of the virtues.
【24h】

A defense of Aristotle's doctrine of the unity of the virtues.

机译:捍卫亚里士多德关于美德统一的学说。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An important question for any virtue ethics theory is, assuming there is more than one moral virtue, how do the various moral virtues fit together? Do they fit together in any systematic way, or are they only loosely and contingently connected to each other?; In Nicomachean Ethics VI 12-13 Aristotle provides his answer to this important question. He argues that phronesis (often translated as 'practical wisdom') requires the moral virtues and the moral virtues require phronesis (cf. 1144 b 30-32), This doctrine, commonly known as the unity of the virtues, has been subjected to much criticism by recent philosophers. Phillipa Foot and Alasdair MacIntyre reject the doctrine because they believe that moral virtues may be used for wicked ends and so do not require phronesis. Peter Geach rejects the doctrine because he believes that a person may possess a moral virtue in one area but a vice in another area. Richard Kraut and Elizabeth Telfer reject the doctrine because they believe that a person may be virtuous in one area but merely continent in another area. Finally, Terence Irwin rejects the doctrine because he believes it requires encyclopedic knowledge of the phronimos and is inconsistent with Aristotle's claims that generosity, magnificence, proper pride, and magnanimity are distinct virtues and a person may possess the "small-scale" virtues of generosity and proper pride without possessing the corresponding "large-scale" virtues of magnificence and magnanimity.; In my dissertation I defend Aristotle's doctrine against these objections. In my first chapter I sketch the rationale behind Aristotle's doctrine and the reasons why these recent philosophers reject it. I begin my defense with a consideration of Aristotle's account of happiness in chapter two. In chapter three I consider Aristotle's account of moral virtue. I examine his account of phronesis in chapter four and his accounts of the particular moral virtues in chapter five. Finally, in chapter six, I provide an extensive discussion of Aristotle's arguments for the unity of the virtues doctrine and then respond to the objections recent philosophers have raised against this doctrine.
机译:对于任何道德伦理理论来说,一个重要的问题是,假设存在一种以上的道德美德,那么各种道德美德如何融合在一起?它们是否以任何系统的方式组合在一起,或者它们只是松散且偶然地彼此连接?亚里士多德在《尼古玛伦理学》第六十二至十三章中回答了这个重要问题。他认为,语调(通常翻译为“实践智慧”)需要道德美德,而道德美德则需要语气(cf. 1144 b 30-32),这种学说,通常被称为美德的统一,已经遭受了很多考验。最近哲学家的批评。菲利普·富特(Phillipa Foot)和阿拉斯代尔·麦金太尔(Alasdair MacIntyre)拒绝接受这一学说,因为他们认为道德美德可以用于邪恶的目的,因此不需要言语表达。彼得·盖奇(Peter Geach)拒绝该学说,因为他认为一个人可能在一个领域拥有道德美德,而在另一个领域则具有邪恶。理查德·克劳特(Richard Kraut)和伊丽莎白·特尔弗(Elizabeth Telfer)拒绝接受这一学说,因为他们认为一个人在一个地区可能是贤惠的,而在另一个地区只是大陆。最后,特伦斯·欧文(Terence Irwin)拒绝了该学说,因为他认为该学说需要通俗易懂的性爱知识,并且与亚里士多德的主张不一致,即大方,宏伟,应有的自尊心和宽容是独特的美德,一个人可能拥有“小规模”的大方美德。并没有拥有相应的宏伟和宽宏的“大规模”美德而感到自豪。在我的论文中,我捍卫亚里斯多德的学说反对这些反对。在我的第一章中,我概述了亚里士多德学说背后的理论基础以及这些新近的哲学家拒绝该学说的原因。在第二章中,我首先考虑了亚里士多德对幸福的描述。在第三章中,我考虑了亚里士多德对道德美德的论述。我将在第四章中检查他对语调的论述,并在第五章中对他的特殊道德美德的论述。最后,在第六章中,我对亚里士多德关于美德学说统一的论点进行了广泛的讨论,然后回应了最近哲学家对美德学说提出的反对意见。

著录项

  • 作者

    Drefcinski, Shane David.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 403 p.
  • 总页数 403
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号