...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine >Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case
【24h】

Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case

机译:Novus Actus Denteniens的教义并不总是防御:对案件的分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Doctrine of novus actus interveniens (NAI) sometimes plays an important role as a tool of defense in medical negligence suits. It is a Latin phrase which means breakage of the causal chain at some point, relieving the initial wrongdoer. In medical negligence suits, the appearance of an external factor or event in the causal chain and the outcome is not directly related to the negligence of the doctor, but for the novel agent; the doctrine of NAI can be applied and the initial wrongdoer, i.e., the treating physician can be exempted. Autopsy of a similar type of case was performed in a tertiary care hospital in the State of Chhattisgarh. The autopsy findings identified a new factor in the form of dereliction in duty by another physician causing breakage of the chain in the current case described. How to cite this article: Dheeraj AB, Giri SK, Sarma B. Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(10):983-985.Copyright ? 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.
机译:Novus Actus Denteniens(Nai)的教义有时作为医疗疏忽诉讼的防御工具发挥着重要作用。这是一种拉丁语短语,意味着在某些时候破坏因果链,缩短了初始的不法行为者。在医疗疏忽诉讼中,因果链中的外部因素或事件的外观与结果与医生的疏忽直接相关,而是对于新的代理商;可以应用Nai的教义,并且初始的不法行为者,即治疗医师可以免除。在Chhattisgarh状态的第三节护理医院中进行了类似类型的案例的尸检。尸检调查结果确定了通过另一种医生在所描述的当前情况下引起链条破损的职责形式的新因素。如何引用这篇文章:Dheeraj Ab,Giri Sk,Sarma B. Novus Actus Denteniens的学说并不总是防御:分析案件。印度j crit care med 2020; 24(10):983-985.Copyright? 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers(P)有限公司

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号