首页> 外文学位 >Teaching strategies and student achievement in high school block scheduled biology classes.
【24h】

Teaching strategies and student achievement in high school block scheduled biology classes.

机译:高中阶段的教学策略和学生成绩阻止了预定的生物学课。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The objectives of this study included determining whether teachers in block or traditionally scheduled biology classes (1) implement inquiry-based instruction more often or with different methods, (2) understand the concept of inquiry-based instruction as it is described in the National Science Standards, (3) have classes with significantly different student achievement, and (4) believe that their school schedule facilitates their use of inquiry-based instruction in the classroom. Biology teachers in block and non-block scheduled classes were interviewed, surveyed, and observed to determine the degree to which they implement inquiry-based instructional practices in their classrooms. State biology exams were used to indicate student achievement. Teachers in block scheduled and traditional classes used inquiry-based instruction with nearly the same frequency. Approximately 30% of all teachers do not understand the concept of inquiry-based instruction as described by the National Science Standards. No significant achievement differences between block and traditionally scheduled biology classes were found using ANCOVA analyses and a nonequivalent control-group quasi-experimental design. Using the same analysis techniques, significant achievement differences were found between biology classes with teachers who used inquiry-based instruction frequently and infrequently. Teachers in block schedules believed that their schedules facilitated inquiry-based instruction more than teachers in traditional schedules.
机译:这项研究的目的包括确定分组或传统安排的生物学课中的教师(1)是否更频繁地实施探究式教学或采用不同的方法;(2)了解《国家科学》中描述的探究式教学的概念标准(3)的班级学生的学习成绩有很大差异,并且(4)认为他们的上课时间有助于他们在课堂上使用基于探究的教学。对定期和非定期班级的生物老师进行了访谈,调查和观察,以确定他们在课堂上实施基于探究的教学实践的程度。州生物学考试用来表明学生的成绩。在定期安排的班级和传统班级中,教师使用基于探究的指导的频率几乎相同。大约30%的教师不理解国家科学标准中描述的基于探究的教学概念。使用ANCOVA分析和非等价对照组准实验设计,发现常规生物学课程与常规生物学课程之间没有显着成就差异。使用相同的分析技术,在生物学班级与经常使用基于询问的教学的老师之间发现了显着的成绩差异。进度计划表中的教师认为,与传统计划表中的教师相比,他们的计划表在基于查询的教学中提供了更多帮助。

著录项

  • 作者

    Louden, Cynthia Knapp.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Curriculum development.;Secondary education.;Science education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 137 p.
  • 总页数 137
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:10

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号