首页> 外文学位 >Confucian orthodoxy vs. Muslim resistance in late imperial China: The ideological origin and the development of the Hui rebellion in Yunnan under Qing Dynasty (1644-1911).
【24h】

Confucian orthodoxy vs. Muslim resistance in late imperial China: The ideological origin and the development of the Hui rebellion in Yunnan under Qing Dynasty (1644-1911).

机译:帝制晚期中国的儒家正统与穆斯林抵抗:清代(1644-1911年)云南回民起义的思想渊源和发展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Hui (Chinese Muslim) rebellion (1856-1874) in Yunnan was one of the most important historical events which led to the collapse of the Manchu empire and the advent of modern China. But the historical significance of this event has not yet been recognized among western scholars and there has been no English publication about it. My dissertation tends to bring a social scientific approach to discover the ideological and religious aspect of this rebellion.; My major concern is to construct the ideological field of the Hui rebellion, which involves different collective actors interpreting their own situation and justifying the legitimacy of their collective actions. I adopt a group of critical social theories, including Weber's "authority of legitimacy," Bourdieu's "cultural capital", and Scott's "hidden transcript" to build up my theoretical framework.; Besides "Introduction," introducing my theories and methodology, and "Conclusion," summarizing my topic and relating it to contemporary academic disciplines of Islamic and Chinese studies, the rest of my dissertation is divided into six chapters.; In Chapter 2 I trace the ideological-historical root of Han-Hui conflict in the two traditions of Islam and Confucianism and in the intellectual encounter between them from the Tang dynasty (618-907) to the early 19th century.; In Chapter 3 and 4 I focus on the political-ideological context of Yunnan under the Qing dynasty and discuss how Qing ideological mechanisms were established in Yunnan and how Han and Hui brought their own cultures to Yunnan and were effected by Qing institution.; I analyze pre-rebellion Han-Hui conflicts in Chapter 5. This analysis concerns the legitimating claims raised by the Hui rebel leaders, the Han gentry's reaction to Hui rebellious actions, and the oppressive means taken by the imperial government.; In Chapter 6 three Hui rebel leaders, Du Wen-xiu (1828-73), Ma Ru-long (1832-1891), and Ma De-xin (1794-1874), are compared on the basis of their own political and cultural capitals, social connections, and ideologies.; In Chapter 7 I attempt to pinpoint the views of the Hui rebels' enemies, the Han gentry and the imperial government, to the Hui rebellion and to examine the strategies adopted by each of them to suppress it.
机译:云南的回族(中国穆斯林)叛乱(1856-1874年)是最重要的历史事件之一,导致了满族帝国的崩溃和近代中国的到来。但是,这一事件的历史意义尚未得到西方学者的认可,也没有关于它的英文出版物。我的论文倾向于提出一种社会科学的方法来发现这种叛乱的思想和宗教方面。我主要关心的是构建回民起义的思想领域,其中涉及不同的集体行动者解释自己的处境并证明其集体行动的合法性。我采用了一组批判性社会理论,包括韦伯的“合法性权威”,布迪厄的“文化资本”和斯科特的“隐藏的笔录”,以建立我的理论框架。除了“引言”,介绍我的理论和方法,“结论”,概述我的主题并将其与伊斯兰和中国研究的当代学术学科联系起来之外,其余的论文分为六个章节。在第二章中,我追溯了汉回冲突的思想史学根源,主要体现在伊斯兰和儒家两种传统以及唐朝(618-907年)至19世纪初之间的知识分子接触。在第三章和第四章中,我着眼于清代云南的政治思想语境,并讨论了如何在云南建立清代思想机制,以及汉族和回族如何将自己的文化带入云南并受到清朝制度的影响。我在第5章中分析了叛乱前的汉会冲突。这种分析涉及回民起义领导人提出的合法要求,汉族士绅对回民叛乱行动的反应以及帝国政府采取的压迫手段。在第六章中,根据各自的政治和文化比较了三位回民起义领袖杜文秀(1828-73),马如龙(1832-1891)和马德新(1794-1874)。首都,社会关系和意识形态。在第七章中,我试图指出回民叛乱的敌人,汉族绅士和皇室政府对回民起义的看法,并研究他们各自为制止其而采取的策略。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tsai, Yuan-Lin.;

  • 作者单位

    Temple University.;

  • 授予单位 Temple University.;
  • 学科 Religion History of.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.; Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 394 p.
  • 总页数 394
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教史、宗教地理;世界史;民族学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号