首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of African-American athletes' nurturing experiences at historically black and historically white colleges/universities.
【24h】

A comparison of African-American athletes' nurturing experiences at historically black and historically white colleges/universities.

机译:比较非洲裔美国黑人运动员在历史悠久的黑人和白人学校/大学中的养育经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The belief that Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) nurture African-American students better than Historically White Colleges and Universities (HWCU) is widely held. This belief is likely grounded in the historical development of American higher education. Sellers and Kuperminc (1997) proposed that African-American athletes at HBCU will transition better than those at HWCU because they will not be goal discrepant. The purpose of this study was to investigate the level of nurturing experiences of African American athletes at HBCU versus HWCU by Processors, Student Affairs Staff, and Athletics Staff. The problem question was, "Are African-American athletes nurturing levels similar at HBCU and HWCU?";There were 30 students (11 female and 19 male) from the HCBU and 35 students (20 female and 15 male) from the HWCU. The respondents completed a 36-item Nurturing Experience scale developed from a pilot study. The MANOVA results for the institutional-type comparisons on all 12 dependent variables [3 staff types x 4 nurturing dimensions] suggests no statistically significant difference [F(12,52) = 1.40, p = .197] between institution types. Due to the exploratory nature of this study, follow-up univariate results were analyzed. The univariate results indicated that there were statistically significant differences between institution-types for Athletic Staff Career Development (F = 6.43, p = .014) and Athletic Staff Career Experiences (F = 4.85, p = .031). There were no significant differences between institution-types for the remaining 10 dependent variables.;These results revealed two key findings. First, there was no overall significant difference between HBCU and HWCU nurturing levels. Second, the univariate differences that did emerge were on the Career Development and Career Experiences dimensions; these indicated that HWCU had higher nurturing scores. The differences that were found may be explained by resource discrepancies that exist at HBCU (receiving fewer) versus HWCU (receiving more). The results suggest that in today's educational environment, both institution types may nurture African-American student-athletes similarly. This is contrary to Sellars and Kuperminc's assumption that HBCU would nurture better. Studies with larger samples are needed to develop a fuller picture of nurturing levels at HBCU and HWCU.
机译:人们普遍认为,历史悠久的黑人大学(HBCU)会比历史悠久的白人大学(HWCU)更好地培养非洲裔美国学生。这种信念很可能基于美国高等教育的历史发展。 Sellers和Kuperminc(1997)提出HBCU的非裔美国运动员的过渡要比HWCU的非运动员更好,因为他们不会出现目标差异。这项研究的目的是调查处理者,学生事务人员和田径人员在HBCU与HWCU上的非洲裔美国运动员的培养水平。问题问题是:“非洲裔美国运动员在HBCU和HWCU培养的水平是否相似?”; HCBU有30名学生(11名女性和19名男性)和HWCU有35名学生(20名女性和15名男性)。受访者完成了一项由试点研究得出的36项“育儿经验”量表。对所有12个因变量[3个员工类型x 4个培养维度]进行机构类型比较的MANOVA结果表明,机构类型之间没有统计学上的显着差异[F(12,52)= 1.40,p = .197]。由于这项研究具有探索性,因此对随访的单因素结果进行了分析。单变量结果表明,体育人员职业发展的机构类型(F = 6.43,p = .014)与体育人员职业经历(F = 4.85,p = .031)之间存在统计学差异。其余10个因变量的机构类型之间没有显着差异。这些结果揭示了两个关键发现。首先,HBCU和HWCU的培养水平之间没有总体上的显着差异。其次,确实出现的单变量差异是在职业发展和职业经历方面。这些表明HWCU的育成分数较高。发现的差异可以用HBCU(接收较少)与HWCU(接收更多)的资源差异来解释。结果表明,在当今的教育环境中,两种机构类型都可以类似地培养非裔美国学生运动员。这与塞勒斯和库珀明克关于HBCU可以更好地培养的假设相反。需要对较大样本进行研究,以全面了解HBCU和HWCU的培养水平。

著录项

  • 作者

    Martin, Gerald M.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.;
  • 学科 Education Sociology of.;Education Administration.;Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 108 p.
  • 总页数 108
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会学;教育;高等教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号