首页> 外文学位 >Donatello's variations on a theme: Subjectivity in quattrocento perspective.
【24h】

Donatello's variations on a theme: Subjectivity in quattrocento perspective.

机译:多纳泰洛(Donatello)在主题上的变奏:quacentrocento视角的主体性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The overly technical direction of the scholarship on perspective is responsible for the negative view of several Renaissance artists, but most notably, Donatello. The technical discussions of perspective have resulted, to a large extent, from the identification of the perspective construction with vision--that is, from the general assumption that the significance of the perspective construction lies in its correspondence with the geometry of vision. Perspective is viewed as the equivalent of vision, a perceptual model, and not recognized as an endlessly flexible schema upon which any number of constructions for the representation of vision may be based.; For many Quattrocento artists, Donatello first among them, perspective's significance lay beyond the strict application of the geometrical principles of vision. The first chapter of this dissertation provides an overview of the more prominent studies on perspective and a critical reevaluation of Erwin Panofsky's Perspective as Symbolic Form. The second discusses the physical and optical aspects of perspective, specifically the Quattrocento understanding of geometry in general and things optical in particular. In addition, it includes a discussion of Donatello's application of optical corrections to his early sculpture, which permitted the introduction of subjectivity into the perspective construction. The third focuses on this subjectivity, which allowed Donatello to emphasize the narrative in his Sagrestia Vecchia and pulpit reliefs in San Lorenzo, Florence, and High Altar reliefs in St. Antonio, Padua. Suggesting that the origins of perspective lie in classical skenographia and its development during the Middle Ages, the third chapter also explores an alternative to the perceptual model. Renaissance linear perspective resulted from the application of the geometry of light, seen as a system of equal modular quantities, to the schema of the theater, which was, at base, architectural. The fourth chapter then addresses the virtually precise application of the one-point perspective construction in Donatello's Cavalcanti Annunciation, as considered within the broader context of other representations of the subject.
机译:学者们对视角的过度技术指导导致了几位文艺复兴时期艺术家的消极看法,但最明显的是多纳泰罗。透视图的技术讨论在很大程度上是由于用视觉识别了透视图结构,也就是说,是基于这样一个普遍的假设,即透视图结构的重要性在于其与视觉几何形状的对应关系。透视被看作是视觉的等效物,是一种感知模型,而不是被认为是一种无限灵活的模式,在该模式下可以使用任何数量的视觉表示构造。对于许多Quattrocento艺术家而言,Donatello首先是他们,透视图的意义不仅仅在于严格应用视觉几何原理。本论文的第一章概述了关于视角的更杰出的研究,并对欧文·帕诺夫斯基的《视角作为象征形式》进行了批判性的重新评价。第二部分讨论了透视图的物理和光学方面,特别是Quattrocento对几何的理解,尤其是对光学事物的理解。此外,它还讨论了Donatello将光学校正应用到他的早期雕塑中的过程,从而将主观性引入到透视结构中。第三个重点是这种主观性,这使Donatello可以强调他的Sagrestia Vecchia中的叙述以及佛罗伦萨的San Lorenzo的讲坛浮雕以及帕多瓦的St. Antonio的High Altar浮雕。第三章暗示了观点的起源在于经典的刻印术及其在中世纪的发展,第三章还探讨了感知模型的替代方法。文艺复兴时期的线性透视是由于将光的几何形状(被视为相等的模块化数量的系统)应用于剧院的基础架构而形成的。然后,第四章讨论了多纳泰洛的《卡瓦尔坎蒂报喜》中单点透视构造的几乎精确应用,这是在该主题的其他表示形式的更广泛范围内考虑的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号