首页> 外文学位 >Uniqueness of club wheat vs. soft white wheat.
【24h】

Uniqueness of club wheat vs. soft white wheat.

机译:俱乐部小麦与软白小麦的独特性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Pacific Northwest (PNW) is well recognized for its soft white wheat production and it is the only area where club wheat is grown. Overseas and domestic users of club and soft white wheats highly appreciate properties of both classes of wheat, especially the unique end product quality of club wheat. Broad growing conditions (climatic and soil) of the PNW, as well as new varieties, have resulted in undesirable changes in both classes of wheat in recent years (e.g., increased hardness, protein content and starch damage). These changes in wheat quality are of concern to users of both classes of wheat. Therefore, several approaches were applied to address quality characteristics within each class of wheat and differences in quality between club and soft white winter wheats based on: (1) grain characteristics; (2) milling performance; (3) protein quality; (4) dough rheology; and (5) starch properties.;Club wheat was significantly lower in test weight and 1000 kernel weight than SWW wheat. In spite of this, club wheat exhibited better milling performance than SWW wheat. There was no difference, on average, in protein (and ash) content between both classes of wheat through years and locations. Consistently, club wheat was significantly lower in sodium dodecyl sulfate sedimentation volume and significantly higher in urea dispersibility than SWW wheat. SWW wheat was significantly higher in alveograph parameters and had longer mixograph mixing time than club wheat, which indicates stronger gluten strength. These distinctly different features of gluten proteins in club wheat resulted from the low score and amount of high molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS). As the result of the present study, cv. Hyak was eliminated from the class of club wheat since it does not show the unique pattern of HMW-GS. Both classes of wheat flour had comparable levels of starch content, starch damage and amylograph flour peak viscosity, while differing significantly in peak viscosity of isolated starches.;The results based on a large quantity of material grown for three years in seven locations showed that club wheat exhibited better stability in grain characteristics, milling performance, protein quality and starch properties than SWW wheat.
机译:西北太平洋地区(PNW)以其柔软的白色小麦产量而广为人知,并且是唯一的俱乐部小麦种植区。球茎和软白小麦的海外和国内使用者高度赞赏这两类小麦的特性,尤其是球茎小麦独特的最终产品质量。近年来,西北太平洋地区广泛的生长条件(气候和土壤)以及新品种导致两类小麦发生不良变化(例如,硬度增加,蛋白质含量增加和淀粉破坏)。两种小麦的使用者都担心小麦品质的这些变化。因此,基于以下几个方面,采用了几种方法来解决每一类小麦的品质特征以及硬白和软白冬小麦之间的品质差异:(1)谷物特性; (2)铣削性能; (3)蛋白质质量; (4)面团流变学; (5)淀粉特性。;小麦的容重和1000粒重明显低于SWW小麦。尽管如此,俱乐部小麦显示出比SWW小麦更好的制粉性能。从年份和地点来看,两类小麦之间的蛋白质(和灰分)含量平均没有差异。一致地,与SWW小麦相比,俱乐部小麦的十二烷基硫酸钠沉淀量明显较低,而尿素分散性则明显较高。 SWW小麦的光记录仪参数显着更高,并且混合仪的混合时间比俱乐部小麦更长,这表明面筋强度更高。俱乐部小麦中面筋蛋白的这些明显不同的特征是由于高分子量的谷蛋白亚基(HMW-GS)的得分低和数量少引起的。作为本研究的结果,简历。 Hyak由于没有显示HMW-GS的独特模式,因此被排除在俱乐部小麦类别之外。两种小麦粉的淀粉含量,淀粉破坏度和淀粉粉的峰值粘度均具有可比性,而分离淀粉的峰值粘度却存在显着差异。;基于在七个位置生长三年的大量物料的结果表明,与SWW小麦相比,小麦在籽粒特性,制粉性能,蛋白质品质和淀粉特性方面表现出更好的稳定性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lin, Po-Ying.;

  • 作者单位

    Washington State University.;

  • 授予单位 Washington State University.;
  • 学科 Agriculture Food Science and Technology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 216 p.
  • 总页数 216
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号