首页> 外文学位 >A farming systems analysis of irrigation institutions.
【24h】

A farming systems analysis of irrigation institutions.

机译:灌溉机构的耕作系统分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The potential for cooperation on common property resources is affected by asymmetries among their users. The fundamental asymmetry on an irrigation canal is that of location. As water flows down the channel, it seeps, evaporates, and is stolen out of turn by upstream farmers. The principal contribution of this thesis is the development of a mathematical programming model to study the causes and consequences of locational asymmetry.;The model is written as a sequence of representative farms over space, each farm a linear programming problem over 9 crops and 14 inputs. The numerical parameters are from data collected in a canal-irrigated village in Maharashtra, but the underlying farming systems analysis is general. Three model versions represent different management regimes--the efficient "planner" who maximizes total revenues on the channel; the equitable Irrigation Department which allots each acre an equal share of water, but cannot adjust for seepage; and finally, individualistic farmers who steal extra water, often with the connivance of the canal inspector.;The numerical solutions to each version answer the following questions: What is the spatial distribution of water, crops and profits? Is the water allocation efficient and/or equitable? If not, which farmers would support a change in water management? The three regimes lead to very different outcomes. The solutions indicate that only farmers on the lower two-thirds of the channel would cooperate to reduce stealing or seepage. This prediction is consistent with observations from an irrigators' association in the study village.;The model provides a tool to derive quantitative relationships between the extent of water theft and the quality of farmers' wells, their recharge capacity, the crop choices, and the penalty upon detection. These objective conditions vary across watercourses on a canal, so the potential for cooperation also varies, a fact rarely recognized in sociological or game-theoretic analyses of cooperation.;For irrigation policy to succeed, the irrigators must cooperate. The location-centred models in this dissertation show that a cooperative formed by simple majority, rather than by consensus or a two-thirds majority, has the best chance of encouraging efficiency and equity.
机译:共同财产资源合作的潜力受到其用户之间不对称性的影响。灌溉渠的基本不对称性在于位置。当水从河道流下时,它会渗入,蒸发并被上游农民不择手段地偷走。本论文的主要贡献是开发了一个数学编程模型来研究位置不对称的原因和后果。该模型被写为一系列代表农场的空间序列,每个农场在9种作物和14种投入物上都有线性规划问题。数值参数来自在马哈拉施特拉邦的一个运河灌溉村庄收集的数据,但是基本的耕作系统分析是一般的。三种模型版本代表了不同的管理体制-高效的“计划者”,可以最大化渠道的总收入;公平的灌溉部门,每英亩分配等量的水,但不能进行渗水调整;最后,是个人主义的农民,通常是在运河检查员的陪同下偷水的。每个版本的数值解都回答了以下问题:水,作物和利润的空间分布是什么?配水是否有效和/或公平?如果没有,哪些农民会支持水管理的改变?这三种制度导致了截然不同的结果。解决方案表明,只有渠道下三分之二的农民才会合作以减少偷窃或渗漏。该预测与研究村灌溉协会的观察结果一致。该模型提供了一种工具,可以得出水盗窃程度与农民水井质量,补给能力,农作物选择以及土壤水量之间的定量关系。被发现时受到惩罚。这些客观条件在运河上的各个水道上各不相同,因此合作的潜力也各不相同,这一事实在合作的社会学或博弈论分析中很少得到认识。;要使灌溉政策成功,灌溉者必须合作。本文以区位为中心的模型表明,由简单多数而不是共识或三分之二多数组成的合作社最有可能鼓励效率和公平。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ray, Isha.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Economics Agricultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 185 p.
  • 总页数 185
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号