首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of students' achievement and attitude as a function of lecture/lab sequencing in a non-science majors introductory biology course.
【24h】

A comparison of students' achievement and attitude as a function of lecture/lab sequencing in a non-science majors introductory biology course.

机译:在非理科专业生物学入门课程中,学生的成就和态度作为讲座/实验室顺序的函数进行比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This investigation compared student achievement and attitudes toward science from three different sequencing approaches used in teaching biology to nonscience students. The three sequencing approaches were the lecture course only, lecture/laboratory courses taken together, and laboratory with previously taken lecture approach.;The purposes of this study were to determine if (1) a relationship exists between the Attitude Towards Science in School Assessment (ATSSA) scores (Germann, 1988) and biology achievement, (2) a difference exists among the ATSSA scores and sequencing, (3) a difference exists among the biology achievement scores and sequencing, and (4) the ATSSA is a reliable instrument of science attitude assessment for the undergraduate students in an introductory biology nonmajors laboratory and lecture courses at a research I institution during the fall semester 1996. Fifty-four students comprised the lecture only group, 90 students comprised the lecture and laboratory taken together approach, and 23 students comprised the laboratory only approach.;Research questions addressed were (1) What are the differences in student biology achievement as a function of the three different methods of instruction? (2) What are the differences in student attitude towards science as a function of the three different methods of instruction? (3) What is the relationship between post-attitude (ATSSA) and biology achievement for each of the three methods of instruction?;An analysis of variance utilized the mean posttest scores on the ATSSA and mean achievement scores as the dependent variables. The independent variables were the three different sequences of enrollment in introductory biology. At the.05 level of significance, it was found that no significant difference existed between the ATTS and laboratory/lecture sequence. At the.05 level of significance, it was found that no significant difference existed between achievement and laboratory/lecture sequence.;A Pearson product moment correlation was used to see if a relationship existed between posttest ATSSA scores and achievement totals in each sequence. A significant relationship was noted between the ATSSA and achievement in each sequence that involved a laboratory component.
机译:这项调查比较了非生物学类学生从生物学教学中使用的三种不同测序方法对学生的成就和对科学的态度。这三种排序方法仅是讲座课程,讲座/实验室课程一起使用,以及以前采用讲座方法的实验室;本研究的目的是确定(1)在学校评估中对科学的态度之间是否存在联系( (ATSSA)分数(Germann,1988)和生物学成就,(2)ATSSA分数和排序之间存在差异,(3)生物学成就分数和排序之间存在差异,(4)ATSSA是1996年秋季学期,在一家研究型I机构的基础生物学入门课程中对本科生进行科学态度评估。54名学生组成了仅讲座小组,90名学生组成了讲座和实验室研究方法,23名学生是实验室唯一的方法。所解决的研究问题是(1)三种不同教学方法的功能? (2)根据三种不同的教学方法,学生对科学的态度有何不同? (3)三种教学方法中每一种的态度后态度(ATSSA)与生物学成绩之间有什么关系?方差分析利用ATSSA的平均事后测试分数和平均成绩分数作为因变量。自变量是入门生物学的三种不同的入学顺序。在.05的显着性水平上,发现ATTS与实验室/讲座序列之间不存在显着差异。在.05的显着性水平上,发现成就与实验室/讲座序列之间没有显着差异。;使用Pearson乘积矩相关性来查看每个序列中测验ATSSA得分与成就总数之间是否存在关系。在涉及实验室组成部分的每个序列中,ATSSA与成就之间都存在着显着的关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hurst March, Robin Denise.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Missouri - Columbia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Missouri - Columbia.;
  • 学科 Science education.;Higher education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 78 p.
  • 总页数 78
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号