首页> 外文学位 >Unmasking science, technology, engineering, and math: A feminist policy analysis.
【24h】

Unmasking science, technology, engineering, and math: A feminist policy analysis.

机译:揭露科学,技术,工程和数学:女性主义政策分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) rests solidly at the top of education agendas, and holds a privileged position amongst academic disciplines in terms of funding and other forms of resource allocation. Yet, in spite of the overwhelming presence of STEM in education, there is little research that critically examines the nature and development of STEM itself, especially STEM policy problems, and particularly those related to the recruitment and retention of women and people of color (POC) in these fields. This study maps how STEM policy problems related to women and POC are discursively constructed, and examines the assumptions embedded within the framing of these problems. Using feminist science studies and feminist poststructuralist discourse analysis, this study analyzes representations of diversity and diverse bodies in 25 major STEM equity policy documents. It demonstrates that these documents merely superficially address social justice in education, and to democratic ideals of equal opportunity. Rather, the push to 'include' more 'diverse' bodies in STEM is about allowing these formerly excluded people the opportunity to participate in the global marketplace. In these documents, gendered and racialized bodies are used as tools to enact neoliberal global dominance, and diversity in STEM is therefore one of many discursive tools employed to discipline and assimilate women's bodies and racialized bodies into compliance with their subjection as human capital. As such, STEM policy documents actually reify difference and legitimate inequity in their representations of women and POC. This study also shows that STEM is at a pivotal moment in history in which there are possibilities for radical transformative practices that reshape the way STEM is done, taught, and represented, as well as who STEM is for.
机译:科学,技术,工程和数学(STEM)始终处于教育议程的首位,并且在资金和其他形式的资源分配方面在学术学科中享有特权。然而,尽管STEM在教育中占绝对优势,但很少有研究能严格地审查STEM本身的性质和发展,特别是STEM政策问题,尤其是与招募和挽留妇女和有色人种有关的问题(POC )。这项研究描绘了如何以话语方式构建与妇女和POC相关的STEM政策问题,并研究了这些问题框架中所包含的假设。本研究使用女权主义科学研究和女权主义后结构主义话语分析,分析了25个主要STEM股权政策文件中多样性和多样化主体的代表。它表明,这些文件只是表面上针对教育中的社会正义,以及平等机会的民主理想。相反,推动在STEM中“包含”更多“多样化”的机构是为了让这些以前被排斥的人有机会参与全球市场。在这些文件中,将性别和种族化的机构用作在全球范围内确立新自由主义统治的工具,因此,STEM中的多样性是用来约束和吸收妇女机构和种族化机构以使其服从于其作为人力资本的众多论断工具之一。因此,STEM政策文件实际上是在妇女和POC的代表上弥补了差异和合法的不平等。这项研究还表明,STEM正处于历史的关键时刻,在此,激进的变革实践有可能重塑STEM的完成方式,教学方式和代表方式以及STEM的宗旨。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gleason, Shannon Christine.;

  • 作者单位

    Washington State University.;

  • 授予单位 Washington State University.;
  • 学科 Education policy.;Educational philosophy.;Education history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 220 p.
  • 总页数 220
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号