首页> 外文学位 >Using the Internet to conduct qualitative health research: Methodological and ethical issues.
【24h】

Using the Internet to conduct qualitative health research: Methodological and ethical issues.

机译:使用互联网进行定性健康研究:方法论和道德问题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While developments in information technology provide unique opportunities for researchers, they pose many challenges as well. This thesis examines the methodological and ethical issues involved in using the Internet to conduct a naturalistic, qualitative study of an electronic mutual aid/self-help (MASH) group. Field notes, generated by the researcher, were used in conjunction with archived e-mail postings and semi-structured on-line interviews in the analysis of how the Internet influenced both the social setting and the research process.;As a social setting for research, the electronic MASH group was characterized by "fluid" boundaries, and this had implications for theoretical sampling and for participants' experiences of support. Furthermore, the lack of a shared time/space context facilitated and hindered the process of implementing qualitative methodology (e.g. conducting interviews) and necessitated a re-examination of methodological and ethical issues critical to qualitative research (e.g. meaning of boundaries, public/private distinction).
机译:信息技术的发展为研究人员提供了独特的机会,同时也带来了许多挑战。本文研究了使用互联网进行电子互助/自助(MASH)小组的自然主义,定性研究所涉及的方法论和道德问题。由研究人员生成的现场记录与已归档的电子邮件发布和半结构化的在线采访结合使用,以分析互联网如何影响社会环境和研究过程。 ,电子MASH组的特征是“流体”边界,这对理论抽样和参与者的支持经验都有影响。此外,缺乏共享的时间/空间背景会促进和阻碍实施定性方法的过程(例如进行访谈),并且有必要重新审查对定性研究至关重要的方法和伦理问题(例如界限的含义,公共/私人区分) )。

著录项

  • 作者

    Polzer, Jessica Celie.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Sociology Theory and Methods.;Information Science.
  • 学位 M.Sc.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 179 p.
  • 总页数 179
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号