首页> 外文学位 >Heidegger and the Greeks: Hermeneutical-philosophical sketches of ignorance, blindness and not-being in Heidegger's 'Beitraege'. Plato, Plotinus and Proclus.
【24h】

Heidegger and the Greeks: Hermeneutical-philosophical sketches of ignorance, blindness and not-being in Heidegger's 'Beitraege'. Plato, Plotinus and Proclus.

机译:海德格尔与希腊人:海德格尔的《背叛》中的无知,盲目与虚无的诠释哲学草图。柏拉图,声乐和Proclus。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Concealed in Ignorance, Blindness and Not-Being lie our real themes of knowledge, truth and Being. The condition of possibility for such a thing is a positive role for negation. Plato was the first to take up such a problematic in the Sophist, and it forms the core common to the philosophical research of Heidegger and the Neoplatonists, receiving, in all of Heidegger's works, its fullest development in the Beitrage, which, to that extent, present Heidegger's own brand of Platonism (chapter 1). Working on the same problematic following the lead of the Beitrage, we seek to see Plato through Heidegger's eyes. The link between virtue and the divine (daimon) of the problematic of Socratic ignorance is projected in outline as homologous to the inner movement of thought of the Beitrage as a whole (chapter 3). What Plato left unsaid in the "flight to the logoi" (Phaedo 99d), the negative relation to the origin preserved in the fear of being blinded of the eclipse-analogy, where Plato speaks of the truth of the origination of the Ideas, is projected in outline as homologous to the Lichtung fur das Sichverbergen of the fifth part of the Beitrage (chapter 4). The One in Us of the Neoplatonists, grasped via the negations of Not-Being, is projected in outline as homologous to the Ultimate God of the seventh part of the Beitrage (chapter 5). In each case the sketches presented are believed to be pioneering as to analytical method if not result and the most closely related Platonic, Heideggerian and other authorities are considered (chapter 2).
机译:在无知,盲目和不存在中隐藏着我们真正的知识,真理和存在的主题。这种事情的可能性条件是否定的积极作用。柏拉图是最先在苏菲派中提出这样一个问题的人,它构成了海德格尔和新柏拉图主义者的哲学研究的共同核心,在海德格尔的所有作品中都得到了贝托格里奇的最大发展。 ,介绍海德格尔的柏拉图主义自有品牌(第1章)。在Beitrage的领导下,研究同样的问题,我们试图通过海德格尔的眼光看柏拉图。美德与苏格拉底无知的问题的神性(魔道)之间的联系被勾勒出轮廓,与整个贝塔克拉奇思想的内部运动是一致的(第3章)。柏拉图在“逃亡的标志”(Phaedo 99d)中未说的是,由于害怕被日食类目所蒙蔽而保留了与起源的消极关系,柏拉图在其中谈到了思想起源的真相。投影轮廓与Beitrage第五部分的Lichtung fur das Sichverbergen同源(第4章)。通过否定性的否定把握了我们的新柏拉图主义者中的一个,其轮廓被概述为与Beitrage第七部分的终极神(第5章)同源。在每种情况下,如果不能得出结果,则认为所提供的草图是分析方法的先驱,并且考虑了最紧密相关的柏拉图式,海德格尔式和其他机构(第2章)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Durigon, Albert Peter.;

  • 作者单位

    Trinity College Dublin (University of Dublin) (Ireland).;

  • 授予单位 Trinity College Dublin (University of Dublin) (Ireland).;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Classical literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 181 p.
  • 总页数 181
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 金融、银行;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号